Iowa @ Maryland plays (Video)
 

Play #1:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KB1OXxgMXY8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play #2:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ng2cUyTa_3w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Play 3:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xkMNiuk2-aw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Peace

1) Obvious travel and can't believe these refs (although only one may have been watching play) missed it and no one else appears to mind either!!

2) Although I might have treated it differently, nothing wrong with it.

3) Obvious indeed.

That's not a backcourt violation.

It isn't? Seems to me that when #2 white touches the ball in the BC, it is an obvious violation.;)

Ball isn't in the backcourt when he touches it.

Good eye.

1. Travel, someone doesn't know the rule.
2. Holding foul on W35.
3. Not a BC violation, yet. Need one more touch.

Agree on all.

#2, I don't see anything the player in black did wrong.

I agree. I would have just had a foul against the White player

Since you are using a pronoun, "he", not sure to whom you are referring. Ball was in BC when #2 touched it.

It was in the air over the backcourt and still had FC status. The ball didn't touch the floor until AFTER the touch. So at that point it had backcourt status, but it needed to be touched by another (or the same) white player for it to be a violation.

Had that white player tipped the ball in his save attempt, such that the ball bounced almost right down the midcourt line, and was recovered by A2 reaching over the time line such that he stayed entirely in the front court, is there a violation there? Same question, but if the ball took 2-3 bounces in the back court before landing in the FC, and was then recovered?

The ball either hits the division line or doesn't in your first scenario, which are you intending?

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Yes, agreed, accept it was then touched by another player, #2.

#2 and the ball both had frontcourt status when he touched it.

Just so everybody is clear White #2 is the wing that is opposite the table. I can't see the numbers of the player who made the errant pass or the one who tried to "save" that pass (the wing on the table side).

The whistle is blown shortly after the table side player touches the ball. It should not have been. #2 eventually picks up the ball in the back court in the center circle.

Sorry. Thought bucky was referring to the player that touched it while both had frontcourt status.

Sorry, I mean it is rolling in the backcourt. No player in team A touches the ball while that player has BC status in my scenario.

Right, so No. 2 is just picking up a dead ball. That doesn't suddenly make an incorrect backcourt call correct.

I don't disagree. Just trying to clarify Bucky's comments.

Technically, it should have been an IW, with ball back to white. That's picking nits on what was going to be an obvious violation.

1. I will assume a Big Ten ref knows the rule, but just missed the call.
2 and 3, agreed.

On 1....I'm not so sure. He probably knows the basics of the travel rule, but it's hard to say he just "missed" this one. It's not really possible to do that move and not travel lol.

If he took his eyes off the shooter at just the wrong moment to see the defender, he may not have seen it well enough to make a call. This is the most basic of travel rules, so the idea that he doesn't know the rule is more difficult for me to believe than the idea that he just looked away at the wrong moment.