Video Request: PCF and Crew Mechanics

[SNIPERBBB]

I think L should of gone across with a bit more hustle.

New C looks like he was looking at the play the whole time .

[bob jenkins]

Good rotation. The ball was below the FT line (not that this is a requirement), and there was no post player on the L's old side.

Probably a foul, but when the defender is already moving back and the offensive player stops, the defender keeps moving even without a little shove, so it's sometimes hard to get.


No call on one end ==> no call on the other -- that's the consistency coaches want, right?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

I think L should of gone across with a bit more hustle.

New C looks like he was looking at the play the whole time .

I have no issue with the rotation "hustle." Some suggest you should not run at all during a rotation. And he had nothing else going on on that side of the ball.

It does look like the C is watching the play, I was just wondering if he go screened by one of the two players and passed for that reason. But to me this looks like a foul on the dribbler.

Peace

[Bob Bball]

The hustle problem in this clip is the C. He stopped running and walked the last 10 steps into position. He was there yet when the push off happened. He was still moving. We do not make good decisions if we are not ready! He was not ready.
The original C and new trail on the other side stayed and looked like he was looking at the drive into the key and that match up which was his only match up to look at.
He did not make a call. And he did not make a call at the other end.
Nobody went fishing out of their primary.
Should there have been fouls at both ends. Of course!