I'm confused because going to the arrow is the "technical rule" in the play you describe.

The case play 8.6 that billy set out above says officials recognize their error just after ball rebounded. One team disadvantaged so go to arrow etc. The correction comes under this rule and case play.

Suppose the rebound comes to the shooter with most if not all on lane thinking it was 2 shots because officials announced it. Little to no effort made to rebound. Unlike the play in 8.6, let say these officials still dont recognize the screw up. Shooter dribbles around and either throws it out of bounds or say she scores. In other words, play continues. After the ball is thrown out of bounds or basket made everybody starts yelling about it. Now they go to the table and figure it out.

Is it too late, technically speaking, under the rules to correct this? It is within the correctable error time frames but this really isnt one of the a-e in 2-10. Sniper's play doesnt really say if everybody attempted to rebound but we see in it that play it goes to POI. Do the rules require us to recognize and fix this right away? If we dont and play continues do we say too late to address it.

I havnt had it happen and if it did id still go back to the arrow rather than saying it is too late to fix but im wondering if that is supported under the rules. Hopefully, its a never in a career play. Just curious...

Yes, and he was wondering which one because the right way forward depends on the answer.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk