![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The issue of how to handle fouls occurring during a throwin could have been so much more easily handled with a change to the foul rules than a change to the definition of team control. |
Quote:
A PC foul can happen without PC, so why not just have a definition that allows a TC foul to happen without TC. |
Disposal ...
Quote:
awarded a throw-in to Team A at a designated spot. No Team A player comes to the spot even though the official has allowed ample time for them to respond. The official then places the ball on the floor and begins the five-second count. (a) Both A1 and A2 step out of bounds and A1 picks up the ball; or (b) both A1 and A2 step out of bounds and A1 picks up the ball and hands it to A2. RULING: In (a), A2 must immediately return inbounds. In (b), it is a throw-in violation when A1 hands the ball to A2. |
[QUOTE=Camron Rust;992906]Prior to the rule change to have TC on a throwin, that was the case....team control only started (in the old rules) when player control was obtained.
But, the resumption of play procedure has been around for awhile???? So, that wasn't quite true even under the old rule??? |
They need to get rid of the resumption-of-play procedure. So dumb. Just give us the ability to call a delay of game.
|
Quote:
Quote:
(EDIT for clarity: UNDER THE OLD RULE) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=Camron Rust;993001]
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=ronny mulkey;993195]
Quote:
It USED to say something like, "TC begins when PC begins. PC begins when a player is holding or dribbling a live ball inbounds." (emphasis added) So, there was no PC or TC during a throw-in (or when the the ball was at the disposal). |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29pm. |