![]() |
Quote:
|
Oh!!! My Bad. Never Mind! :D
|
I want to beat the tape with every call. Does that mean I will always be right? Nope. Not at all. I just want to call things that show up as obvious on tape and everyone watching. If there is a big question, then I do not want it to be called.
I also do not care what the fans say either. Fans are not the reason I feel this way about a call. I made a call in a summer game that a fan knew was correct, but then tried to tell me, "You cannot make that call at that time of the game" as if to suggest that it was obvious but I should simply pass on the violation because it "decided the game." Peace |
He thinks I can read! Thanks man
|
Thanks guys.
Final question. Based on the dialogue and premise already discussed. Would you find it a valuable exercise if someone (not you - its way too time consuming) broke down some game film (slow motion, bio mechanic breakdown) with one or more of the following purposes: A) Using dartfish or other training tech to break down no calls/passed on calls not involving contact (ie. Not judgement call fouls but rather violations) to determine actions that are consistently called and not called/passed on but are in fact violations when the film is broken down. B) Using aforemetioned technology to look at no calls/passed calls not involving contact and tracking the ensuing result of the play. C) Using the technology to track the number of correctly/incorrect made calls vs correct/incorrect no calls in regards to violations. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59pm. |