SMU @ Cincinnati Plays

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

I had a pushing foul. IMO, it didn't matter what the dribbler did, where he was, etc. The offensive player displaced the defender.

You say that push and the screening action occurred at the same time, thus an illegal screen. I didn't see it like that the first time, but upon further viewing, like I said, I'm good with that.

I had no problem with that question, just the subsequent responses telling me what I said is the same thing. It's not... There can be a push separate from an illegal screen.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

Which goes back to my question, which signal would you give to the table regardless if it were a screen or not? You were the one telling us it was wrong to call an illegal screen a push.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Which goes back to my question, which signal would you give to the table regardless if it were a screen or not? You were the one telling us it was wrong to call an illegal screen a push.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Hey, I admitted I was wrong when I said there must not be an illegal screen signal (same as blocking signal). But there is a pushing signal. And that there is the difference I was referring to.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk