Hanging on the Rim
In two recent games, I've had a partner call a T for hanging on the rim on a dunk attempt, once from L, when I passed on it from T. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with either decision (even though I wouldn't touch that call from L), but I'd like to hear from some of you on what you look for when judging whether or not to call a T for hanging on the rim on a dunk.
Thanks in advance for your feedback! |
Hanging on the rim is ok if they're trying to avoid injuring themselves/others. (the exact wording of the rule is different, but that's spirit of the rule)
So if there are other players in the 'landing zone' or if the dunker winds up being momentarily off-balance as a result of dunking, handing on the rim is acceptable. Showboating, doing chin-ups, etc, are all disallowed by rule. My personal opinion: If the dunk is in a crowd, I'm more likely to give leeway for a momentary rim-hang. If it's on a breakway, less leeway assuming he's not off-balance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's rare, but I've seen some really bad calls for "hanging on the rim." I'm giving players the benefit of the doubt if I ever think they're making sure there is a safe spot to land. Even on a fast break, all alone, if I'm dunking, I want to stop swinging and make sure there's no one coming up behind me that may have their feet somewhere under me. Chin-ups and other actions like it are an easy tell for a T. However, some players could take longer to feel like it's safe to let go of the rime. No one underneath + not off balance doesn't necessarily equal a T for me. |
Quote:
1) [NBA - but still applies] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfaaN-MFC_k 2) Kentucky vs. Mississippi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XRIqAXSYpo 3) High school (I think?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcwOmGZys74 Thoughts? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What about this from one of my high school games this year? I'm Slot. https://streamable.com/spzh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
With that said he probably does just a very slight pull up but almost immediately after that he appears to be looking down to make sure nobody is below him before he releases. In regards to the other 3 videos... I agree that 1 and 3 are good calls. #2 on the Brow was a bad call. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think they want us to get that one in Ohio based on the video they should from the tournament last year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A very similar dunk to this one happened in the OHSAA state finals (I think it even got discussed here). It was shown and the referee who called the T was commended both for the call and his calm manner in which he called it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't see anywhere in the rules where going parallel to the ground is an automatic T. He let go as soon as he got his balance and was able to land on his feet. We're going to agree to disagree on this one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have no problem disagreeing with a position that is 100% incorrect. I have seen at least 2 similar videos where my HS and college assignors and interpreters have said it's a T. I'll go by their directive and my judgement. |
Quote:
When his momentum is taking him forward that fast, he has to put tension on the rim to get him back to a safe position. In my case, I call that pulling up. If he puts a little too much on it, his body goes up. If I think he's doing it to avoid injury vs. showboating, I'm ok with it. |
Quote:
That was showboating. "Hey look at me, I just sole the ball, and got a fast break dunk so let me put a little extra on it." This is the type of behavior that as a group officials do a real crappy job of addressing. Especially when coaches, the FED, assignors, instructors, EVERYONE harps that we need to curtail poor sportsmanship. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It seems to me that the exception has largely swallowed the rule. IIRC, in the dark ages, you couldn't hang, period. So you chose whether or not to dunk knowing you couldn't hold the rim as you did it. It seems (and I could be wrong) that greater tolerance and the idea of protecting oneself came with the "snap back" rims designed to protect backboards. (As I recall, the first generation of safety rims just pulled away and had to be manually reset, and the next generation had the snap-back feature.) When the safety rule first came in, it seems to have been pretty limited in what was permitted, but over time more and more was permitted (less clear danger needed to justify and more gymnastics permitted as part of it). From a non-ref perspective, it seems to me the attitude began as "it better be obvious you're protecting yourself and needed to do what you did" or its a T, and has evolved into "hey, it's a safety rule, so unless I'm sure you're showboating or taunting, I'm not gonna question what you need to do to protect yourself if anyone's around."
But maybe that's just a misperception on my part -- I'd be curious what those who have been doing this for eons think. |
For whats it worth the opposing team coaches thought it should have been called.
To me when the legs start swinging parallel to the body in this situation, a T is warranted and defensible. |
Quote:
I think your assessment of the evolution of the rule and its enforcement is spot on. We wouldn't have points of emphasis if rule enforcement didn't tend to evolve. Remember when slapping the backboard was a POI in…2007/2008ish? Lots of Ts called the first couple of years. Players stopped doing it. Now I've noticed they're starting to do it again, and few calls are being made. We all seem quick to say, "I think he might have been trying to block the shot so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt." Rule evolution is……interesting? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26am. |