The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Over and Back ? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/100516-over-back.html)

Karl M Johanson Wed Dec 16, 2015 04:10am

Over and Back ?
 
NFHS rules:
A1 has a throw in along the sideline, the throw in touches A2 in A's front court and bounces into back court where it is touched by A3. Is it Over and Back?

I believe that when the rule was changed to create team control fouls the rule makers then had to rule that the ball was in team control during a throw in and thus this possibly changed the ruling to over and back. However, the rules now state that for it to be O & B the ball must first be in Team Control "in the front court." But a throw in is from out of bounds and therefore has no status.

It will be over and back if the touch by A2 establishes team control in the front court and is the last touch in front court all at the same time.

Camron Rust Wed Dec 16, 2015 05:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl M Johanson (Post 973078)
NFHS rules:
A1 has a throw in along the sideline, the throw in touches A2 in A's front court and bounces into back court where it is touched by A3. Is it Over and Back?

I believe that when the rule was changed to create team control fouls the rule makers then had to rule that the ball was in team control during a throw in and thus this possibly changed the ruling to over and back. However, the rules now state that for it to be O & B the ball must first be in Team Control "in the front court." But a throw in is from out of bounds and therefore has no status.

It will be over and back if the touch by A2 establishes team control in the front court and is the last touch in front court all at the same time.

No violation.

The NFHS really messed up the this area but has made it clear that there should be no change in the way backcourt violations are to be called.

There must be team control inbounds by the OLD definition of team control before the backcourt violation rules are in effect.

Raymond Wed Dec 16, 2015 08:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl M Johanson (Post 973078)
NFHS rules:
A1 has a throw in along the sideline, the throw in touches A2 in A's front court and bounces into back court where it is touched by A3. Is it Over and Back?

I believe that when the rule was changed to create team control fouls the rule makers then had to rule that the ball was in team control during a throw in and thus this possibly changed the ruling to over and back. However, the rules now state that for it to be O & B the ball must first be in Team Control "in the front court." But a throw in is from out of bounds and therefore has no status.

It will be over and back if the touch by A2 establishes team control in the front court and is the last touch in front court all at the same time.

They need verbiage to state that PC is required inbounds before any BC violation can occur.

ODog Wed Dec 16, 2015 08:52am

... and the title of this thread needs to be changed to "Backcourt?"

"Over and back" needs to disappear along with other hacky fanspeak phrases like "over the back," "reaching in," "on the floor," etc.

And sadly, these get a TON of use in our fraternity too :(

#olderthanilook Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ODog (Post 973088)
... and the title of this thread needs to be changed to "Backcourt?"

"Over and back" needs to disappear along with other hacky fanspeak phrases like "over the back," "reaching in," "on the floor," etc.


And sadly, these get a TON of use in our fraternity too :(

Don't sweat the small stuff.

OKREF Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ODog (Post 973088)
... and the title of this thread needs to be changed to "Backcourt?"

"Over and back" needs to disappear along with other hacky fanspeak phrases like "over the back," "reaching in," "on the floor," etc.

And sadly, these get a TON of use in our fraternity too :(

I agree. "Over and back", just sounds bad.

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:54am

Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.


I wish I had a cool signature

Raymond Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.


I wish I had a cool signature

I occasionally let "on the floor" slip out. But I also try "on the dribble", "before the shot", "no shot".

SC Official Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:01am

Oh, no! ANOTHER backcourt thread? :D

(Not a violation per NFHS interp.)

OKREF Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.


I wish I had a cool signature

"No shot"

SC Official Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.

"On the floor" is fanboy and wreck league talk.

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973120)
"On the floor" is fanboy and wreck league talk.


Odd then that it continues in the vernacular of a LOT of referees.
Judgmental much?


I wish I had a cool signature

SC Official Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973122)
Odd then that it continues in the vernacular of a LOT of referees.
Judgmental much?


I wish I had a cool signature

And more often than not, those referees aren't working high-level games. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule.

Judgmental? Find me a camp that teaches officials that it's acceptable to say "on the floor."

Raymond Wed Dec 16, 2015 10:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973124)
And more often than not, those referees aren't working high-level games. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule.

Judgmental? Find me a camp that teaches officials that it's acceptable to say "on the floor."

Camps I attend only care about that verbiage when the rule is being kicked. If the official making that ruling is correct, then observers/supervisors don't care.

#olderthanilook Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 973133)
Camps I attend only care about that verbiage when the rule is being kicked. If the official making that ruling is correct, then observers/supervisors don't care.

I'm assuming you are referencing experiences at college level camps.

Mark Padgett Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:06am

I only use "on the floor", "over the back" and "reach" when I'm putting the moves on a hot mom. :rolleyes:

Unfortunately, they usually reply that I have "no shot". :(

bob jenkins Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 973139)
I only use "on the floor", "over the back" and "reach" when I'm putting the moves on a hot mom. :rolleyes:

Unfortunately, they usually reply that I have "no shot". :(

Even when you do get a shot, it turns out you have a broken possession arrow.

UNIgiantslayers Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 973139)
I only use "on the floor", "over the back" and "reach" when I'm putting the moves on a hot mom. :rolleyes:

Unfortunately, they usually reply that I have "no shot". :(

This is good Basketball Foruming.

AABATTEE Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:22am

[QUOTE=BlueDevilRef;973113]Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.


So what are the correct phrases to use ?

BoomerSooner Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett (Post 973139)
I only use "on the floor", "over the back" and "reach" when I'm putting the moves on a hot mom. :rolleyes:

Unfortunately, they usually reply that I have "no shot". :(

Could be worse...you could end up with an interrupted dribble.

Camron Rust Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AABATTEE (Post 973147)

So what are the correct phrases to use ?

There are many options....but on the floor is not one of them. "On the floor" is not informative. A player on the floor may or may not be in the act of shooting.

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973124)
And more often than not, those referees aren't working high-level games. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule.



Judgmental? Find me a camp that teaches officials that it's acceptable to say "on the floor."


All I'm saying is that judgements and generalizations do not help anyone. But forgive me for not remembering that a few guys on here are the best referees ever and have never messed anything up and can only be bothered to leave the house to work Duke vs Carolina.

In my very humble opinion, you could use a very real dose of humility. If you read my post, I stated I was aware that I needed to try to get rid of the statement and simply asked what some of the other phrases were that guys used. Nobody needs you to imply they are a lesser official or a fanboy. But I'll wear that mantle proudly. It's why I'm here. Trying to get better and hell yes I'm a fan. I love this game, it's one of the reasons I call.


I wish I had a cool signature

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 973164)
There are many options....but on the floor is not one of them. "On the floor" is not informative. A player on the floor may or may not be in the act of shooting.


THIS is the type of input that I was seeking and is actually helpful.


I wish I had a cool signature

Welpe Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack

You failed. Horribly.

Dad Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 973164)
There are many options....but on the floor is not one of them. "On the floor" is not informative. A player on the floor may or may not be in the act of shooting.

It is an option, but not necessarily a good one. Every official knows what their partner means, whether you're going to admit it or not is something else.

As for good methods, anything that lets your partners/players/coaches know the player wasn't in the act of shooting. Some sort of, "NO SHOT!" tends to be the best since it applies to so many situations.

"On the floor" can make you look like an idiot. Players jumps and your call on the foul is that he was passing the ball, not shooting. The moment you say "ON THE FLOOR!" you're going to get murdered. You just told everyone you thought the obvious airborne passer(shooter in their eyes) was on the floor.

#olderthanilook Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 973172)
It is an option, but not necessarily a good one. Every official knows what their partner means, whether you're going to admit it or not is something else.

As for good methods, anything that lets your partners/players/coaches know the player wasn't in the act of shooting. Some sort of, "NO SHOT!" tends to be the best since it applies to so many situations.

"On the floor" can make you look like an idiot. Players jumps and your call on the foul is that he was passing the ball, not shooting. The moment you say "ON THE FLOOR!" you're going to get murdered. You just told everyone you thought the obvious airborne passer(shooter in their eyes) was on the floor.

I agree, DAD. "On the floor" is ambiguous, at best. After all, habitual shooting motion can certainly begin before a player has left the floor jumping for a try. Should they not be awarded 2 FTs simply because the foul by B1 was committed while A1 was beginning his/her habitual shooting motion while "on the floor"?

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 12:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Welpe (Post 973168)
You failed. Horribly.


Sorry. I should have just started a new one.


I wish I had a cool signature

ODog Wed Dec 16, 2015 05:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 973119)
"No shot"

+1

Never fails, and it's exactly what you mean.

Adam Wed Dec 16, 2015 05:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 973087)
They need verbiage to state that PC is required inbounds before any BC violation can occur.

scrapper offered the perfect solution at the time: mirror the NCAA wording.

TC is not changed, but TC fouls include fouls committed by members of the TI team during a TI.

Camron Rust Wed Dec 16, 2015 05:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 973221)
scrapper offered the perfect solution at the time: mirror the NCAA wording.

TC is not changed, but TC fouls include fouls committed by members of the TI team during a TI.

Exactly. Pretty much how fouls by an airborne shooter are considered PC fouls even though there is no PC.

But, what about after the throwin is touched inbounds but before there is control. That is no longer "during" the throwin. Need to have words in effect to cover the window between when the throwin ends and when there is really team control.

Adam Wed Dec 16, 2015 05:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 973172)
It is an option, but not necessarily a good one. Every official knows what their partner means, whether you're going to admit it or not is something else.

As for good methods, anything that lets your partners/players/coaches know the player wasn't in the act of shooting. Some sort of, "NO SHOT!" tends to be the best since it applies to so many situations.

"On the floor" can make you look like an idiot. Players jumps and your call on the foul is that he was passing the ball, not shooting. The moment you say "ON THE FLOOR!" you're going to get murdered. You just told everyone you thought the obvious airborne passer(shooter in their eyes) was on the floor.

My biggest issue with "on the floor" is that most of the time, the shooting motion begins discernibly before the player leaves the floor. It actually means nothing and perpetuates a myth. It really is similar, in my view, to "over the back" and "reaching in" being used by officials.

Mark Padgett Wed Dec 16, 2015 07:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoomerSooner (Post 973148)
Could be worse...you could end up with an interrupted dribble.

As long as "illegal use of hands" and "holding" are allowed, I'm OK. :rolleyes:

WhistlesAndStripes Wed Dec 16, 2015 08:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973113)
Not to hijack but for those of you who don't like "on the floor", what do you use or prefer? I don't mind it. I know that every call technically happens "on the floor" but I still catch myself using it at times. I try to wave off and say "before the shot" but old habits die hard.

The reason you don't say "On The Floor" around here is because we have one smartass official who, if you do, at halftime or after the game will ask you, "WHY DID YOU CALL THAT FOUL ON THE FLOOR? WHAT DID THE FLOOR DO?!?!?!?":D

Karl M Johanson Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:18pm

Agree new wording needed
 
I am glad the discussion returned to my question about backcourt violations (I quickly learned not to use meaningless "old school" terms and phrases). As I originally alluded to I believe that the backcourt violation interpretation was not sufficiently updated when NFHS created "team control fouls" and then had to quickly rule that there was "team control" during throw ins. It would be much clearer if the rules clearly stated that has to be player control in front court after a throw in.

BlueDevilRef Wed Dec 16, 2015 09:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes (Post 973231)
The reason you don't say "On The Floor" around here is because we have one smartass official who, if you do, at halftime or after the game will ask you, "WHY DID YOU CALL THAT FOUL ON THE FLOOR? WHAT DID THE FLOOR DO?!?!?!?":D


Ha!! That's funny and will be very helpful in not using that phrase anymore. I'll hopefully recall that the floor can't foul anyone.


I wish I had a cool signature

Raymond Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl M Johanson (Post 973236)
...It would be much clearer if the rules clearly stated that has to be player control in front court after a throw in.

It doesn't need to be in the FC, just inbounds at some point.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Adam Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:31am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl M Johanson (Post 973236)
I am glad the discussion returned to my question about backcourt violations (I quickly learned not to use meaningless "old school" terms and phrases). As I originally alluded to I believe that the backcourt violation interpretation was not sufficiently updated when NFHS created "team control fouls" and then had to quickly rule that there was "team control" during throw ins. It would be much clearer if the rules clearly stated that has to be player control in front court after a throw in.

This is a problem many here have predicted each year as the NFHS failed to adequately fix the rule to match their (repeatedly) stated intention: not affecting anything except whether free throws are shot.

SC Official Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:49am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef (Post 973165)
All I'm saying is that judgements and generalizations do not help anyone. But forgive me for not remembering that a few guys on here are the best referees ever and have never messed anything up and can only be bothered to leave the house to work Duke vs Carolina.

In my very humble opinion, you could use a very real dose of humility. If you read my post, I stated I was aware that I needed to try to get rid of the statement and simply asked what some of the other phrases were that guys used. Nobody needs you to imply they are a lesser official or a fanboy. But I'll wear that mantle proudly. It's why I'm here. Trying to get better and hell yes I'm a fan. I love this game, it's one of the reasons I call.

Don't be ridiculous. This is a forum for grown adults who often have differing opinions. I didn't bully you, or call you a fanboy. But yes, often fanboys are the ones yelling "on the floor." And I'm only a high school official, and I'm not afraid to admit it, so you can take your Duke-UNC comment elsewhere.

Don't attack my humility because you got butthurt about me making a statement that upset you.

SC Official Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:52am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 973133)
Camps I attend only care about that verbiage when the rule is being kicked. If the official making that ruling is correct, then observers/supervisors don't care.

Any camp I've ever been to, clinicians most certainly care about an official saying "on the floor." But you and I go to different types of camps I'm sure.

Dad Fri Dec 18, 2015 01:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973354)
Any camp I've ever been to, clinicians most certainly care about an official saying "on the floor." But you and I go to different types of camps I'm sure.

How would you even know this? What does different types of camps mean?

SC Official Fri Dec 18, 2015 01:06am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dad (Post 973355)
How would you even know this? What does different types of camps mean?

Because I've been to my fair share of camps and not one clinician that I remember has failed to correct an official using "on the floor"?


College vs. high school

Dad Fri Dec 18, 2015 01:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973357)
Because I've been to my fair share of camps and not one clinician that I remember has failed to correct an official using "on the floor"?


College vs. high school

I can't recall this ever happening at a camp. Then again, I can't recall anyone ever saying "on the floor" at a camp.

BillyMac Fri Dec 18, 2015 07:26am

You Don't Say ...
 
https://forum.officiating.com/basket...tml#post927149

BlueDevilRef Fri Dec 18, 2015 08:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 973120)
"On the floor" is fanboy and wreck league talk.


Didn't call me a fanboy? Weird how that is exactly what you did and now deny it.

If you don't like the verbiage, I was looking for input on what words you use, not to be insulted. I'm not butthurt, but I'm not going to be chastised either.

Contrary to popular belief around here at times, it's pretty easy to not be a jerk when replying


I wish I had a cool signature


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1