The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 15, 2015, 05:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1
NBA Loose Ball Foul Question

Hi, I have a question about an unusual play that occurred at the end of tonights Pistons-Clippers game, and I was wondering if someone with more knowledge about the rules might be able to explain it better to me.

There were 25 seconds left in the 4th qtr, both teams were in the penalty, and Jamal Crawford of the Clippers was at the FT line for the 2nd of 2 FTAs. His teammate JJ Redick was positioned next to the Pistons' Andre Drummond for the rebound (should Crawford miss).

After Crawford released the 2nd FTA (and before the shot went in), Redick intentionally fouled Drummond while the ball was still in the air, in an attempt to circumvent the "no hack-a-shaq allowed under 2 minutes" rule.

Crawford's FT went in and the basket was counted, and Drummond was awarded 2 FTs at the other end as a result of what was called a loose ball foul on Redick and the Pistons being in the penalty.

There are a few things I am confused about here.

1. If the foul was called before it went in, then there wasn't a loose ball yet, so how can it be a loose ball foul?

And if it was called after it went in, shouldn't that be a dead ball foul instead?

2. Why did Crawford's FT count if his teammate committed a foul as he was shooting?

I often see plays where a FG is waved off because a teammate committed a foul off the ball as he was shooting. It's usually ruled an offensive foul, basket no good, and possession awarded to the defense (but no FTs awarded the other way).

However, in this case a foul was committed by the offense as a teammate was in the act of shooting a FT, and the FT counted, and the defense was awarded 2 FTs at the other end.

It feels like it should have been one or the other. Either the FT should count and no foul should be called because he made it, or the foul should be called but the FT shouldn't count because it was a violation on the offense in the act of shooting.

Can anyone explain this to me and tell me if this was called correctly or not?

You can watch the play here:

https://vine.co/v/imAv1ULVAWh

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 15, 2015, 06:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mttat44 View Post
Hi, I have a question about an unusual play that occurred at the end of tonights Pistons-Clippers game, and I was wondering if someone with more knowledge about the rules might be able to explain it better to me.

There were 25 seconds left in the 4th qtr, both teams were in the penalty, and Jamal Crawford of the Clippers was at the FT line for the 2nd of 2 FTAs. His teammate JJ Redick was positioned next to the Pistons' Andre Drummond for the rebound (should Crawford miss).

After Crawford released the 2nd FTA (and before the shot went in), Redick intentionally fouled Drummond while the ball was still in the air, in an attempt to circumvent the "no hack-a-shaq allowed under 2 minutes" rule.

Crawford's FT went in and the basket was counted, and Drummond was awarded 2 FTs at the other end as a result of what was called a loose ball foul on Redick and the Pistons being in the penalty.

There are a few things I am confused about here.

1. If the foul was called before it went in, then there wasn't a loose ball yet, so how can it be a loose ball foul?

And if it was called after it went in, shouldn't that be a dead ball foul instead?

2. Why did Crawford's FT count if his teammate committed a foul as he was shooting?

I often see plays where a FG is waved off because a teammate committed a foul off the ball as he was shooting. It's usually ruled an offensive foul, basket no good, and possession awarded to the defense (but no FTs awarded the other way).

However, in this case a foul was committed by the offense as a teammate was in the act of shooting a FT, and the FT counted, and the defense was awarded 2 FTs at the other end.

It feels like it should have been one or the other. Either the FT should count and no foul should be called because he made it, or the foul should be called but the FT shouldn't count because it was a violation on the offense in the act of shooting.

Can anyone explain this to me and tell me if this was called correctly or not?

You can watch the play here:

https://vine.co/v/imAv1ULVAWh

Thanks
It is a loose ball as team control ends on the release of the shot.

The free throw counts since the foul was committed after the release.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
loose ball foul yankeesfan Football 9 Sat Sep 19, 2015 06:44am
Loose Ball Foul? MathReferee Basketball 16 Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:48am
Loose Ball: Foul or Not APG Basketball 20 Sat Nov 09, 2013 09:22pm
NBA loose ball foul Jay R Basketball 6 Fri May 18, 2007 08:25pm
Loose ball or TD? tskill Football 7 Tue Aug 15, 2006 02:07pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1