Quote:
Originally Posted by Refhoop
Just seemed like the logical: clock was 26.2 and now the clock says 15.9?
BTW: with my remote in-hand I had the "touch" at 16.9.
I'm more interested in why neither official said: the clock went from 26 to 15 and we had no violation... Crap, either my count was off or the clock didn't stop in time.
Q. If they go to the monitor to review clock stoppage... Is the ten second violation "not reviewable"?
My intent is not to be disparaging or negative, just seeking clarification.
|
To follow up on Jeff's comment - as well as my previous post - the only way this can be reviewed is to correct a clock error. You can't go back and call the violation (if there is a violation). Think of it this way: If officials miss a travel - or another violation or a common foul - they can't go back and call it using video review. The same theory applies here.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
|
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 02:01am
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
