2015-16 The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules ...

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OKREF

Rut, I read this as you saying there had to be a player possessing the the ball in the FC.

Really??

Originally Posted by OKREF

Yes you must first possess the ball.

Duh!!!

Originally Posted by OKREF

This possession could happen in the BC.

OK, but we were only talking about a throw-in as it relates to the ball being tapped and bouncing around from the FC to the BC. This would not apply if the throw-in pass was touched in the BC first or only.

Originally Posted by OKREF

Not talking about a throw in at all. We are actually in agreement, I think, and I read it wrong.

Yes you did. We never were talking about any other kind of situation. That is why I am confused as to why you are trying to hold on to what is or is not 100% correct.

Peace

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Really??



Duh!!!



OK, but we were only talking about a throw-in as it relates to the ball being tapped and bouncing around from the FC to the BC. This would not apply if the throw-in pass was touched in the BC first or only.



Yes you did. We never were talking about any other kind of situation. That is why I am confused as to why you are trying to hold on to what is or is not 100% correct.

Peace

These kinds of responses are why I will never, ever have any kind of respect for you. I just said I miss read what you typed and you come across like you do. There are a lot of people on here who, when they have something to say I really take it in a listen to, however you are certainly not one of them. It's all good though, have a great day.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OKREF

These kinds of responses are why I will never, ever have any kind of respect for you. I just said I miss read what you typed and you come across like you do.

Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

No case play is 100% correct either. Many statements are contextual. You missed the context of the statement. Let it go.

What is this supposed to mean?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.

And that casebook play you mentioned does not go along with the written rule. When all else fails, I am going with the rulebook and what it states.

Peace

This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

[bballref3966]

Why is this thread still open? To watch a p*ssing match?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.



This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

Even OKREF backed off of his statements when he realized he was arguing something that was not at issue. And he changed or edited his post from what he originally said. But you did not see that either (he admitted to this).

You continue to keep up the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

I think what I do on this forum is the last of my concern.

I respond because I can.

Keep up the good fight.

Peace