The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   2015-16 The Most Misunderstood Basketball Rules ... (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/100279-2015-16-most-misunderstood-basketball-rules.html)

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 06:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 969316)
Rut, I read this as you saying there had to be a player possessing the the ball in the FC.

Really?? :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 969316)
Yes you must first possess the ball.

Duh!!! :eek:

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 969316)
This possession could happen in the BC.

OK, but we were only talking about a throw-in as it relates to the ball being tapped and bouncing around from the FC to the BC. This would not apply if the throw-in pass was touched in the BC first or only.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 969316)
Not talking about a throw in at all. We are actually in agreement, I think, and I read it wrong.

Yes you did. We never were talking about any other kind of situation. That is why I am confused as to why you are trying to hold on to what is or is not 100% correct.

Peace

OKREF Sun Nov 08, 2015 06:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 969319)
Really?? :rolleyes:



Duh!!! :eek:



OK, but we were only talking about a throw-in as it relates to the ball being tapped and bouncing around from the FC to the BC. This would not apply if the throw-in pass was touched in the BC first or only.



Yes you did. We never were talking about any other kind of situation. That is why I am confused as to why you are trying to hold on to what is or is not 100% correct.

Peace

These kinds of responses are why I will never, ever have any kind of respect for you. I just said I miss read what you typed and you come across like you do. There are a lot of people on here who, when they have something to say I really take it in a listen to, however you are certainly not one of them. It's all good though, have a great day.

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 06:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKREF (Post 969320)
These kinds of responses are why I will never, ever have any kind of respect for you. I just said I miss read what you typed and you come across like you do.

Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

SC Official Sun Nov 08, 2015 09:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 969318)
No case play is 100% correct either. Many statements are contextual. You missed the context of the statement. Let it go.

What is this supposed to mean? :confused:

SC Official Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 969321)
Then do not have respect for me. You and the other guys insisting on picking a nit like this, is the reason I really do not care much for what you would say anyway. You did not read the conversation and tried to hold on to what was "wrong" about the conversation. You also did not read the other comments by others that said the same thing but some strange reason only picked on my comments.

You will get over it. If you don't, not my problem.

Peace

Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 969328)
Rut, you flat out said that the case play that OKREF posted was wrong, even though the rules support it. It has nothing to do with the "throw-in." You said it was wrong, and then got defensive.

OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

SC Official Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 969329)
OK, if you say so. Again you did not read the situation and started talking about it without knowing the context. That is what Cameron was saying. It is also obvious that you did not know he edited his post and reference either.

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 969330)
And it is clear that you refuse to take any blame for posting a blanket statement and an erroneous opinion about a case play.

Good day to you.

It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

SC Official Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 969331)
It is not an erroneous statement. You need PC before you have TC, that is the rule as listed.

There is a reason you are on this island with your friend alone.

Peace

Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.

Quote:


And that casebook play you mentioned does not go along with the written rule. When all else fails, I am going with the rulebook and what it states.

Peace
This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

bballref3966 Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:31pm

Why is this thread still open? To watch a p*ssing match?

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 969332)
Just to refresh your selective memory, this is what you posted.



This statement is not correct. And more than just OKREF and I disagreed with you on this thread. I am not "on this island." In fact, I would argue that you are on an island trying to say that the case play isn't right. Nice try.

Even OKREF backed off of his statements when he realized he was arguing something that was not at issue. And he changed or edited his post from what he originally said. But you did not see that either (he admitted to this).

You continue to keep up the good fight. ;)

Peace

SC Official Sun Nov 08, 2015 10:51pm

Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

JRutledge Sun Nov 08, 2015 11:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 969335)
Good for him. Maybe you should follow his lead and admit that you were wrong.

I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

SC Official Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 969336)
I wasn't wrong. He did not understand the conversation. I was responding to that misunderstanding (he changed the play once again).

Keep fighting the good fight.

Peace

You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

JRutledge Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Official (Post 969337)
You do no wrong ever on this forum.

If you really don't care, stop responding.

I think what I do on this forum is the last of my concern.

I respond because I can.

Keep up the good fight.

Peace


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1