The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:33am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
SITUATION 2: After A1 releases the ball on a free throw try, B1 steps into the lane and backs across the free-throw line to box out the free-throw shooter then makes contact with the free-throw shooter. The free throw is missed. RULING: The official should rule a delayed violation on the opponent. A1 will be awarded a substitute free throw and the contact is ruled a foul. The substitute free throw would be administered with the free-throw lane spaces unoccupied. (9-1-2g Penalty 2b)[/I]

When I go to the online, 2015-16 NFHS Basketball Rules Book, located at the NFHS Site, 9-1-2 is: Teams shall properly occupy marked lane spaces according to number and space requirements. There is no 2g? There is a 3g though?

Also, the situation says, "The substitute free throw would be administered with the free-throw lane spaces unoccupied."

2.b. says: If the try is not successful, the ball becomes dead when the free throw ends, and a substitute throw shall be attempted by the same free thrower under conditions the same as for the free throw for which it is substituted.

If the conditions are "the same," why is the lane now unoccupied?

Did I miss more changes and corrections or is it just too early in the morning for me to process?
Thanks.
More bad editing?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:37am
Stubborn Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
So your state, or at least your association, is going against the expressed wishes of the NFHS?

Didn't some of us get yelled at for suggesting such actions earlier this summer?
"I was just doing what (insert guy's name) told me to do."

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 27, 2015, 07:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
So your state, or at least your association, is going against the expressed wishes of the NFHS?

Didn't some of us get yelled at for suggesting such actions earlier this summer?
I don't think so.

I think some *individuals* got "yelled at" but it was (mostly, at least) with the understanding that (a) the FED could change the interp and (b) the state could have a different interp
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Past Interpretations Archive (2024-25 Added) Nevadaref Basketball 39 Tue Nov 05, 2024 09:52am
The NFHS has released a clarification for the 2015 rules interpretations. bigjohn Football 5 Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:49am
2015-16 NFHS Proposed Basketball Rule Changes ... BillyMac Basketball 35 Tue Mar 17, 2015 08:52am
2015 NFHS Rule Changes Andy Softball 14 Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:43am
2006 NFHS Rule Interpretations TxUmp Baseball 0 Tue Feb 07, 2006 09:03am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1