The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Obstruction/runner hit by ball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/97997-obstruction-runner-hit-ball.html)

fortmoney Sat May 31, 2014 10:28pm

Obstruction/runner hit by ball
 
Had this happen in a PeeWee game the other day

Batter hits the ball toward the middle of first and second. Second base fielder is lined up in the base path. Runner on first slows down to avoid the second baseman. Runner is hit by the second baseman and then hit by the batted ball. Runner is safe at first and second. I rule that the runner would not have gained any further bases and leave it be, runners at first and second. What is the correct call?

Matt Sat May 31, 2014 10:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortmoney (Post 935234)
Had this happen in a PeeWee game the other day

Batter hits the ball toward the middle of first and second. Second base fielder is lined up in the base path. Runner on first slows down to avoid the second baseman. Runner is hit by the second baseman and then hit by the batted ball. Runner is safe at first and second. I rule that the runner would not have gained any further bases and leave it be, runners at first and second. What is the correct call?

Did the second baseman have a play on the ball?

fortmoney Sat May 31, 2014 10:32pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt (Post 935235)
Did the second baseman have a play on the ball?

Yes

Matt Sat May 31, 2014 11:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortmoney (Post 935236)
Yes

INT on the runner, he's out. BR gets 1B, all others return.

umpjim Sun Jun 01, 2014 12:34am

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortmoney (Post 935234)
Had this happen in a PeeWee game the other day

Batter hits the ball toward the middle of first and second. Second base fielder is lined up in the base path. Runner on first slows down to avoid the second baseman. Runner is hit by the second baseman and then hit by the batted ball. Runner is safe at first and second. I rule that the runner would not have gained any further bases and leave it be, runners at first and second. What is the correct call?

Unless you are in Canada where PeeWee might be a different size than we envision your call was incorrect but appropriate for that particular game.

bob jenkins Sun Jun 01, 2014 09:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by umpjim (Post 935239)
Unless you are in Canada where PeeWee might be a different size than we envision your call was incorrect but appropriate for that particular game.

Why do you think it was approprite for that particular game? (serious question)

I'm having trouble seeing where this is anything but INT even at Tee-ball.

MD Longhorn Mon Jun 02, 2014 11:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortmoney (Post 935234)
Had this happen in a PeeWee game the other day

Batter hits the ball toward the middle of first and second. Second base fielder is lined up in the base path. Runner on first slows down to avoid the second baseman. Runner is hit by the second baseman and then hit by the batted ball. Runner is safe at first and second. I rule that the runner would not have gained any further bases and leave it be, runners at first and second. What is the correct call?

Why didn't you have interference? Sounds (at first read) like textbook interference.

Manny A Mon Jun 02, 2014 11:57am

Agree with the others. At all levels, a fielder moving into position to field a batted ball is not subject to an obstruction call. So from your description of the play, the second baseman had every right to be in the runner's path. The moment there is contact between the runner and the second baseman before the second baseman attains possession of the ball, you have interference. You call Time, and rule that runner out. The fact that the batted ball hit the runner has no bearing on the play.

Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Mon Jun 02, 2014 02:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manny A (Post 935315)
Agree with the others. At all levels, a fielder moving into position to field a batted ball is not subject to an obstruction call. So from your description of the play, the second baseman had every right to be in the runner's path. The moment there is contact between the runner and the second baseman before the second baseman attains possession of the ball, you have interference. You call Time, and rule that runner out. The fact that the batted ball hit the runner has no bearing on the play.



And lets not forget the possible second out of the B/R. R1's interference prevented the defensive team from possibly completing a 4-6-3 DP. :D

MTD, Sr.


P.S. We have to get outs anyway we can get them.

Out Sun Jun 08, 2014 01:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 935322)
P.S. We have to get outs anyway we can get them.

Yessir...as long as you get that call RIGHT!! :D

Rich Ives Sun Jun 08, 2014 06:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 935322)
And lets not forget the possible second out of the B/R. R1's interference prevented the defensive team from possibly completing a 4-6-3 DP. :D

MTD, Sr.


P.S. We have to get outs anyway we can get them.

In FED you can call a DP if a DP was possible.

In OBR you can only call a DP if you judge that the runner's actions were a willful deliberate attempt to break up a DP.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1