bluehair |
Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:06pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP45
(Post 881101)
Remember that FED wants to take as much judgement out of our hands as possible.
|
Too true. If Fed didn't have the "can not throw to a base without a disengaging from the wind-up position" code difference, this hybrid stance wouldn't even be an issue. Since there is the potential for a problem with runners on (and they can't trust us umpires to distinguish between potential advantage and none) lets just tell everybody to ball it with no runners on.
And then to make it even more simple (more odorous, IMO), they take what is, by literal wording, a legal set position, and make it illegal, with the wave of hand...
...thanks big bruda.
|