The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 09:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2
Question

I'm new on the forum and so probably missed the answer to this question, but if anyone has the info, I'd appreciate it: In what parks is QuesTec currently installed? Are there plans to install the system in more parks this season? Next season? Thanks much.

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 86
What is Questec?
__________________
They will come Ray...they will Come!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 09:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 210
Smile QuesTec

QuesTec is in 13 ballparks:
Tampa Bay
Shea
Yankee Stadium
Arizona
Oakland
Anaheim
Boston
Cleveland
and 5 more
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 10:13am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by twpcjack
I'm new on the forum and so probably missed the answer to this question, but if anyone has the info, I'd appreciate it: In what parks is QuesTec currently installed? Are there plans to install the system in more parks this season? Next season? Thanks much.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu...estec0606.html

Planned for use in 13 stadiums during 2003, QuesTec is currently evaluating umpires in 10 ballparks: Arizona, Anaheim, Boston, Cleveland, Houston, Milwaukee, Oakland, Tampa Bay and both stadiums in New York.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 10:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2
Wink QuesTek Thanks!

Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 11:17am
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
Just a thought. Would you like to be evaluated this way? Is there anyway to have your zone evaluated in this manner? I might like to try, but it would probably hurt my pride!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 01:23pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by JEL
Just a thought. Would you like to be evaluated this way? Is there anyway to have your zone evaluated in this manner? I might like to try, but it would probably hurt my pride!
JEL,
I would not mind being evaluated in such a manner.
if I'm screwing up anything, or everything, lemmee know.
If I cannot do the job, tell me to go away.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 11, 2003, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Scientific American Frontiers starring Alan Alda had a half hour devoted to the QuesTec system. They were at Fenway Park interviewing the developer. There were some things that bothered me about it.

First, the developer said something to the effect of, "The idea is to help umpires to see strikes at the top of the strike zone that they may not have been calling before, and also to see strikes on pitches that catch the bottom of the strike zone, but were caught too low by the catcher and may not have been called a strike for that reason." So, QuesTec is an effort to get umpires to call strikes on pitches that pretty much no one but Bud Selig wants to see called.

Last night, during the Red Sox versus Blue Jays game, the home plate umpire rung up a strike that looked ridiculously low. The Blue Jays hitter grabbed his head with both hands in disbelief. The plate umpire was pointing emphatically at the front of the plate. Apparently, that was one of those pitches that probably caught the hollow beneath the knee cap at the front of the plate. It looked just silly to see that called a strike the way catcher Jason Varitek handled it. I don't know if that's so good for the game.

The next thing that troubled me was how the QuesTec system approximates the strike zone. There's an extra camera that is intended to do nothing but take a snapshot of the batter's stance. From those snapshots, the system figures out the strike zone of the batter. That doesn't seem to be a very consistent way to determine the zone, in my opinion. The zone could change by several inches depending on exactly when the snapshot is taken, and exactly what position the batter is in at the time.

Finally, the system quite often cannot see the pitched ball while it is in the strike zone. The batter is often in the way of the cameras' abilities to get a full look at the ball as it passes through the zone. So, basically, the system uses a ball flight model. It calculates the velocity and trajectory of a pitch and then guesses where it will be when it reaches the strike zone.

There are some good points to the system. When the umpire receives his CDROM containing a games' worth of pitches, he is able to see illustrations of where the pitch passed through the strike zone, both overhead and from the side. He is also able to click on any pitch and see it replayed as captured by the telecast cameras. Those are valuable training tools.
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1