The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Another 3 Ball Walk NYM @ MIA (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/92310-another-3-ball-walk-nym-mia.html)

LeeBallanfant Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:50pm

Another 3 Ball Walk NYM @ MIA
 
Those of you who access replay of ML games check out Aug 31 Mets game.
Top 5 th Baxter walks on ball 3.
Evidently scoreboard had 3-2 count when it was actually 2-2. Baxter takes ball and sells the walk by immediately running to 1B.

No one says a word.


Can't any of the Marlin coaching staff count to 4. I wouldn't expect Ozzie to do it, but at least one of his coaches might have noticed it.

mbyron Sat Sep 01, 2012 06:26am

No video that I could find. The only Mets video oddity posted for 8/31/2012 was actually from a game back in June of 1999. Two cool things:

1. Mike Piazza is charged with a catcher's balk
2. After Bobby Valentine is run, he sneaks back into the dugout in disguise.

I think this is way more entertaining than your play, Lee, especially the announcers trying to figure out the catcher's balk. :p

<iframe src='http://mlb.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=24353589&width=400&height=22 4&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

Dave Reed Sat Sep 01, 2012 05:07pm

MLB.com Gameday | MLB.com: Gameday
Walked on ball 3, according to Gameday

umpjim Sat Sep 01, 2012 06:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron (Post 853024)
No video that I could find. The only Mets video oddity posted for 8/31/2012 was actually from a game back in June of 1999. Two cool things:

1. Mike Piazza is charged with a catcher's balk
2. After Bobby Valentine is run, he sneaks back into the dugout in disguise.

I think this is way more entertaining than your play, Lee, especially the announcers trying to figure out the catcher's balk. :p

<iframe src='http://mlb.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=24353589&width=400&height=22 4&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

Wasn't that CI. It was not a "catcher's balk" if you are referring to the balk penalty for leaving the box on an intentional walk.

bsaucer Sat Sep 08, 2012 08:29pm

It looks to me as if the catcher ran up to the foul line to catch the pitch. The pitch never crossed the foul line. Therefore it's a no-pitch -- a balk. Had he jumped up to the plate to catch the pitch it would have been interference as well. I guess the same rule applies if it happens on a pitchout


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1