Bud Selig Meets with Ken Hawk Harrelson over Umpire Rant

[jicecone]

Three games my butt.

Have the Big-mouth umpire one game behind the plate and we will truly find out what his true knowledge of the game really is. Hell, he knows it all anyway, so it shouldn't be that hard for him, should it?

[Steven Tyler]

Originally Posted by jicecone

Three games my butt.

Have the Big-mouth umpire one game behind the plate and we will truly find out what his true knowledge of the game really is. Hell, he knows it all anyway, so it shouldn't be that hard for him, should it?

Harry Carey would be talking about an ice cold Budweiser while both teams were emptying the bench.

Hawk is from the old school. Just leave him be.

[asdf]

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler

Hawk is from the old school.

His .239 career average indicates he missed a lot of classes.

[UMP25]

Unfortunately, Harrelson cannot be disciplined by MLB because, as an employee of Comcast Sports, he is not under the control of MLB. Of course, Reinsdorf, who also had a talk with Harrelson, can exercise his "persuasive abilities" and get Comcast to do something if he wanted.

I happened to be watching that game live when Hawk's rant occurred. To say it was unprofessional was an understatement.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by UMP25

Unfortunately, Harrelson cannot be disciplined by MLB because, as an employee of Comcast Sports, he is not under the control of MLB. Of course, Reinsdorf, who also had a talk with Harrelson, can exercise his "persuasive abilities" and get Comcast to do something if he wanted.

I happened to be watching that game live when Hawk's rant occurred. To say it was unprofessional was an understatement.

If MLB gives license for their games to be shown, not saying he can be fired, but MLB probably could take some other actions that would affect the club directly. I am going to assume that is why MLB is bringing in Hawk in for a little talk to remind him that they can do things to hurt the club if he embarrasses them any further.

Peace

[UMP25]

Well, from what the MLB Network said after this on air rant, MLB couldn't do anything to him solely because he "doesn't fall under the control of MLB or the Chicago White Sox."

But as I said, this doesn't mean Reinsdorf can't pressure Comcast to do something if he wanted.

[JRutledge]

I am sure if Reinsdorf said tomorrow, "I do not like Hawks continuous behavior about umpires and how he represents the White Sox Organization," I bet something would be done yesterday. Not because Reinsdorf can directly fire him, but because that if Comcast has a contact with the White Sox and probably does not want to lose that coverage they currently have. And considering who these commentators are and how they have close ties to the organization, I am sure these things are done all the time across the league and other leagues with similar local coverage contracts. Now I doubt Reinsdorf wants him gone or that Hawk is going anywhere soon, but rants like this might force his hand to get involved and I do not see Comcast putting up much of a fight as they have other things to lose over someone so unprofessional. He turned off a lot of people regardless of their affiliation with being an umpire.

Peace

[LeeBallanfant]

Originally Posted by UMP25

Well, from what the MLB Network said after this on air rant, MLB couldn't do anything to him solely because he "doesn't fall under the control of MLB or the Chicago White Sox."

But as I said, this doesn't mean Reinsdorf can't pressure Comcast to do something if he wanted.

To me its simple here. Comcast presumably offered the most money to do the White Sox games and they control the announcers. If Comcast thought Hawk was adversely affecting their ratings, they would let him go. Reinsdorf and Selig might talk to him about the "good of the game" but ultimately its Comcast's decision.

[LMan]

Originally Posted by UMP25

I happened to be watching that game live when Hawk's rant occurred. To say it was unprofessional was an understatement.

TV bobbleheads are required to be professional? Who knew?