The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Twins at Tampa Bay (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/90727-twins-tampa-bay.html)

tmagan Sun Apr 22, 2012 07:43pm

Twins at Tampa Bay
 
On a pop-up to first base, Carlos Pena reaches into the stands to catch the ball. Former NBA player Matt Geiger (although that is irrelevant) interferes with him. The first base umpire correctly rules the ball out of play. Yet the usher escorts Geiger out even though the fan has as much right to the baseball as Pena. Some people just never learn.

SanDiegoSteve Sun Apr 22, 2012 08:09pm

You don't expect the usher to know the rule do you? Remember, these are the unwashed masses who still think the hands are part of the bat.

tmagan Sun Apr 22, 2012 08:14pm

If you pay $500 for the ticket, you do and rules are the rules at the end of the day.

briancurtin Sun Apr 22, 2012 08:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmagan (Post 838403)
The first base umpire correctly rules the ball out of play. Yet the usher escorts Geiger out even though the fan has as much right to the baseball as Pena. Some people just never learn.

The back of my Cubs tickets say the following...

Quote:

Ticket holder is also subject to removal without compensation in management discretion or upon breach of Major League Baseball or Wrigley Field rules.
The fan has as much right to the ball until fan interference is called, then they get to flex their muscles.

Steven Tyler Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:22pm

Thank you, Steve Bartman.

DG Mon Apr 23, 2012 06:58pm

Under the rules it is not fan interference if player is reaching into the stands. But home teams expect fans to give the right of way with home team players, so he was likely escorted out as mgmt flexed. If it had been the opposing team player the fans would have cheered and the ushers silent.

SanDiegoSteve Mon Apr 23, 2012 07:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmagan (Post 838407)
If you pay $500 for the ticket, you do and rules are the rules at the end of the day.

If you pay $500 for one ticket, you should have your head examined.

BSUmp16 Mon Apr 23, 2012 08:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 838596)
Under the rules it is not fan interference if player is reaching into the stands. But home teams expect fans to give the right of way with home team players, so he was likely escorted out as mgmt flexed. If it had been the opposing team player the fans would have cheered and the ushers silent.

Here's the Tropicana Field Rule that deals with the subject:

"2. Fan Interference: Major League Baseball rules require that fans not go onto the field, throw objects onto the field or interfere with balls still in play. Violation may result in ejection from Tropicana Field and prosecution."

and OBR:

Rule 2.00 INTERFERENCE (d) Spectator interference occurs when a spectator reaches out of the stands, or goes on the playing field and (1) touches a live ball or (2) touches a player and hinders an attempt to make a play on a live ball. On any interference the ball is dead.

My interpretation is that although there was no spectator interference, the Tropicana Field rule prohibits interfering with a ball "in play"; and the ball was "in play" until it touched the ground or "any object foreign to the natural ground" (i.e., the fan).

So if the fan interfered with the ability to catch the ball before it touched the fan, he's in violation of the Tropicana Field Rule. If the interference didn't occur until after the fan touched the ball, the fan wasn't in violation of the rule since the ball was then immediately dead and could no longer be "in play"

(Slow day at the office :D)

Rich Ives Mon Apr 23, 2012 08:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSUmp16 (Post 838603)
Here's the Tropicana Field Rule that deals with the subject:

"2. Fan Interference: Major League Baseball rules require that fans not go onto the field, throw objects onto the field or interfere with balls still in play. Violation may result in ejection from Tropicana Field and prosecution."

and OBR:

Rule 2.00 INTERFERENCE (d) Spectator interference occurs when a spectator reaches out of the stands, or goes on the playing field and (1) touches a live ball or (2) touches a player and hinders an attempt to make a play on a live ball. On any interference the ball is dead.

My interpretation is that although there was no spectator interference, the Tropicana Field rule prohibits interfering with a ball "in play"; and the ball was "in play" until it touched the ground or "any object foreign to the natural ground" (i.e., the fan).

So if the fan interfered with the ability to catch the ball before it touched the fan, he's in violation of the Tropicana Field Rule. If the interference didn't occur until after the fan touched the ball, the fan wasn't in violation of the rule since the ball was then immediately dead and could no longer be "in play"

(Slow day at the office :D)

Nice try. Ground rules cannot conflict with the regular rules. 3.13.

BSUmp16 Tue Apr 24, 2012 01:00am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 838606)
Nice try. Ground rules cannot conflict with the regular rules. 3.13.

It's not a ground rule - has nothing to do with a ground rule. It's a Tropicana Field Rule (all parks have them) that applies to when and under what circumstances a fan can be ejected from the park. It tries to blend OBR rules into the mix

Steven Tyler Tue Apr 24, 2012 01:22am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSUmp16 (Post 838622)
It's not a ground rule - has nothing to do with a ground rule. It's a Tropicana Field Rule (all parks have them) that applies to when and under what circumstances a fan can be ejected from the park. It tries to blend OBR rules into the mix

The playing field belongs to the players. The stands belong to the fans.

PERIOD!

No blending necessary.

MD Longhorn Tue Apr 24, 2012 08:13am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 838606)
Nice try. Ground rules cannot conflict with the regular rules. 3.13.

Are you trying to imply that the Trop can't choose when and when not to remove a fan? Or did you just misunderstand his post.

PS to all... Geiger was let back in about an inning later.

Rich Ives Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSUmp16 (Post 838622)
It's not a ground rule - has nothing to do with a ground rule. It's a Tropicana Field Rule (all parks have them) that applies to when and under what circumstances a fan can be ejected from the park. It tries to blend OBR rules into the mix

(and Mike)

So at the Trop you can eject a fan for not interfering because it's illegal there to not interfere?

The alternative is that they removed the fan because they decided it was interference even though the rules say it isn't. OH! Conflict with the playing rules? Just stupid? Bottom line they attempted to eject a fan for interfering when in fact he wasn't because the rules say he wasn't.

How about for wearing a chartruse and orange hat?

Remind to spend my money elsewhere if I'm in the area.

SanDiegoSteve Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 838596)
Under the rules it is not fan interference if player is reaching into the stands. But home teams expect fans to give the right of way with home team players, so he was likely escorted out as mgmt flexed. If it had been the opposing team player the fans would have cheered and the ushers silent.

I don't follow the logic here. The home team expects even fans of their opponents to give the right of way to the home team when it reaches into the fans' domain to attempt a play? If I am a Twins fan, I am going to try to knock the ball out the player's hand who is invading my space, as is my right as a fan. The player is trying to take my souvenir away, and he's going to have to fight me for it. Rays fans may wish to part the Red Sea for their players, that's their prerogative, but you can't legislate or mandate it when it goes against the playing rules of baseball.

MD Longhorn Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 838670)
I don't follow the logic here. The home team expects even fans of their opponents to give the right of way to the home team when it reaches into the fans' domain to attempt a play? If I am a Twins fan, I am going to try to knock the ball out the player's hand who is invading my space, as is my right as a fan. The player is trying to take my souvenir away, and he's going to have to fight me for it. Rays fans may wish to part the Red Sea for their players, that's their prerogative, but you can't legislate or mandate it when it goes against the playing rules of baseball.

Acting drunk or disorderly is not against the playing rules of baseball, but a ballpark can certainly legislate or mandate that you not do it or be removed from the park. The assertion that the ballpark has no authority over it's fans other than those proscribed in the rulebook that rules the game they are watching is asinine.

SanDiegoSteve Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 838684)
Acting drunk or disorderly is not against the playing rules of baseball, but a ballpark can certainly legislate or mandate that you not do it or be removed from the park. The assertion that the ballpark has no authority over it's fans other than those proscribed in the rulebook that rules the game they are watching is asinine.

Now you are comparing apples to onions. The fan was acting within his rights as a fan, not acting drunk and disorderly. Another leap in logic, and nothing in my post said that the ballpark cannot exercise its authority over violations of the law. However, Geiger did nothing at all illegal. Perhaps someone pointed that out, and is why he was later readmitted to the game.

MD Longhorn Tue Apr 24, 2012 03:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 838685)
Now you are comparing apples to onions. The fan was acting within his rights as a fan, not acting drunk and disorderly. Another leap in logic, and nothing in my post said that the ballpark cannot exercise its authority over violations of the law. However, Geiger did nothing at all illegal. Perhaps someone pointed that out, and is why he was later readmitted to the game.

Not a leap in logic at all. If they have posted a rule that says you can't interfere with play, EVEN IF ON THE FAN'S SIDE OF THE FENCE, then you can't interfere with play on the fan's side of the fence. None of this has anything to do with baseball's OBR.

Rich Ives Tue Apr 24, 2012 04:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 838714)
Not a leap in logic at all. If they have posted a rule that says you can't interfere with play, EVEN IF ON THE FAN'S SIDE OF THE FENCE, then you can't interfere with play on the fan's side of the fence. None of this has anything to do with baseball's OBR.

But it's the rules that define what interference is - and this isn't it because there is no interference on the fan's side of the fence.

CT1 Wed Apr 25, 2012 03:09pm

"Ticket holder is also subject to removal without compensation in management discretion ..."

This means they can eject or move you for any (or no) reason. It's their ballpark. It may not be good PR to do so, but they have the right to do it.

DG Wed Apr 25, 2012 07:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 838670)
I don't follow the logic here. The home team expects even fans of their opponents to give the right of way to the home team when it reaches into the fans' domain to attempt a play? If I am a Twins fan, I am going to try to knock the ball out the player's hand who is invading my space, as is my right as a fan. The player is trying to take my souvenir away, and he's going to have to fight me for it. Rays fans may wish to part the Red Sea for their players, that's their prerogative, but you can't legislate or mandate it when it goes against the playing rules of baseball.

I don't see what logic is so hard to understand. If you are are a home team fan help the home team and don't help the visiting team. I'm just saying why mgmt may have ejected a home fan who did not follow home fan etiquette. They should have ignored and be glad they had paid home fans.

SanDiegoSteve Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 838901)
I don't see what logic is so hard to understand. If you are are a home team fan help the home team and don't help the visiting team. I'm just saying why mgmt may have ejected a home fan who did not follow home fan etiquette. They should have ignored and be glad they had paid home fans.

How do you determine a home fan from a visiting fan? I will wear a Pirates shirt and Padres cap when I go to Petco to see my favorite NL East team play. How does the usher determine who you are rooting for?

yawetag Thu Apr 26, 2012 06:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 838934)
How do you determine a home fan from a visiting fan? I will wear a Pirates shirt and Padres cap when I go to Petco to see my favorite NL East team play. How does the usher determine who you are rooting for?

For that case, I'm going to be wearing a Cardinals shirt when I go to Petco next week (Padres v. Marlins), and I'm sitting right against the wall. If I catch a ball on my side of the wall, am I automatically given free reign or automatically ejected?

SanDiegoSteve Fri Apr 27, 2012 08:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by yawetag (Post 839061)
For that case, I'm going to be wearing a Cardinals shirt when I go to Petco next week (Padres v. Marlins), and I'm sitting right against the wall. If I catch a ball on my side of the wall, am I automatically given free reign or automatically ejected?

Free reign, baby! You will not be ejected if the ball in on your side of the wall. Be sure to go to one of the recommended restaurants. I still say Lou & Mickey's in the Gaslamp for a nice steak.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1