The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 01, 2012, 08:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by umpjim View Post
43" in FED if they have been drawn right. Don't remember the depth but doubt it is of interest. Interestingly, there is no front line. The catcher is limited by other rules there. But why are you calling it a Catcher's Balk? It's a balk on the pitcher for starting to pitch with a fielder or catcher not in the proper position. Any catcher setting up for the outside pitch will probably have a foot outside the box. The catcher's technique of extending one leg straight out to get lower also violates this rule. It should not be something an umpire should look to call.
The front of the box is the point of the plate - and it's 8' back from there. See the diagram 2 and rule 2-9-3.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 01, 2012, 08:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 71
i'm guessing these umps also didn't let the pitcher throw any warmups because it was 63 seconds since the 3rd out of the last half-inning
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 01, 2012, 09:27pm
DG DG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,022
Maybe we should hear from ONETIME1 on the circumstances that resulted in the two calls. The one I was thinking of is when the PITCHER is called for a balk when the catcher steps out of the catcher's box when an intentional walk is being done. Don't know why this would happen in FED game since you don't have to pitch to batter, just send him.

It is sometimes called a catcher's balk by some because he caused it, but it is a balk on the pitcher.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 01, 2012, 11:05pm
Is this a legal title?
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
Maybe we should hear from ONETIME1 on the circumstances that resulted in the two calls. The one I was thinking of is when the PITCHER is called for a balk when the catcher steps out of the catcher's box when an intentional walk is being done. Don't know why this would happen in FED game since you don't have to pitch to batter, just send him.

It is sometimes called a catcher's balk by some because he caused it, but it is a balk on the pitcher.
Those who call that play a catcher's balk are just wrong. dash_riprock described it correctly--a 7.07 infraction. It's when a balk is called on the pitcher due to a violation committed by the catcher.

When F1 delivers with F2 out of his box, F1 committed the violation regardless of who "caused" it. I've never called that balk it in my life and (probably) never will.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2012, 12:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG View Post
Maybe we should hear from ONETIME1 on the circumstances that resulted in the two calls. The one I was thinking of is when the PITCHER is called for a balk when the catcher steps out of the catcher's box when an intentional walk is being done. Don't know why this would happen in FED game since you don't have to pitch to batter, just send him.

It is sometimes called a catcher's balk by some because he caused it, but it is a balk on the pitcher.
The Fed rule is not the same as OBR. Any fielder or catcher that is not where they are supposed to be at TOP for any pitch will be in violation of this rule. (Fielders only have to have one foot fair). Fed actually is more lenient in the literal rule since the catcher can step out on any pitch including an IBB just after TOP. OBR is more restrictive in the rule on an IBB but less so in practice. So, we need ONETIMES explanation of what actually happened.
A catcher's or fielder's balk should be rarely called (on the pitcher) in FED. I would say never but maybe somebody can give me an example of why it would be called.

Last edited by umpjim; Mon Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10am.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2012, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 915
You talk about looking for trouble. You call this at any level and you'll never live it down. Talk about preventive officiating this is the classic case. Have the stop sign up and get the catcher back in the box. Pretty simple.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2012, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 121
So is the rule one foot in the catchers box or must both feet be in the catchers box?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 02, 2012, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by onetime1 View Post
So is the rule one foot in the catchers box or must both feet be in the catchers box?
You aren't listening. The "rule" is - don't even think of calling it. If there's a real problem in the making fix it first.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 04, 2012, 02:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
What's a "catcher's balk"? And here dummy me thought only the pitcher can balk.

What's next, a "fielder's balk"?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2012, 12:58am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by gordon30307 View Post
You talk about looking for trouble. You call this at any level and you'll never live it down. Talk about preventive officiating this is the classic case. Have the stop sign up and get the catcher back in the box. Pretty simple.
After applying this method to one catcher, he still didn't understand what I was talking about. It's no fun to be in slot on a RH hitter, the catcher moves, and is stationed in the LH batters box.

Thus a balk became a necessity.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 03, 2012, 09:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 177
I called it once about 25 years ago. In a rec game, catcher moved forward and was in front of the plate at TOP trying to get a jump on a stealing runner.

Agree this is a rule you should know for the test, then forget on the field.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Balk/No Balk: LHP fients pickoff the 3rd base Mike6221 Baseball 4 Sun Jun 07, 2009 09:47pm
Stealing Home, P in Windup, Balk or No Balk? johnnyg08 Baseball 2 Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:12am
Catcher's Balk ? PABlue Baseball 27 Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:47am
Catcher's Balk andrewm Baseball 10 Fri Jun 30, 2006 02:27pm
Catcher's Balk chsbasebal Baseball 18 Tue Nov 06, 2001 09:43pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1