![]() |
|
|
|||
Only called one in my life, and it ended the game, and was obvious. Pitcher could have prevented it. The provisions are, that if you see an obvious one, call it, but it should be rare. Two in one game would be very, very rare.
|
|
|||
43" in FED if they have been drawn right. Don't remember the depth but doubt it is of interest. Interestingly, there is no front line. The catcher is limited by other rules there. But why are you calling it a Catcher's Balk? It's a balk on the pitcher for starting to pitch with a fielder or catcher not in the proper position. Any catcher setting up for the outside pitch will probably have a foot outside the box. The catcher's technique of extending one leg straight out to get lower also violates this rule. It should not be something an umpire should look to call.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
If they were playing under FED, why not use IBB?
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
Quote:
In July of 2000 - Braves vs. Brewers. Home Plate Umpire John Shulock called a rear catcher's balk on Fernando Lunar the back up F2 for the Braves. Of Coarse Mr. Bobby Cox was tossed. Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Balk/No Balk: LHP fients pickoff the 3rd base | Mike6221 | Baseball | 4 | Sun Jun 07, 2009 09:47pm |
Stealing Home, P in Windup, Balk or No Balk? | johnnyg08 | Baseball | 2 | Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:12am |
Catcher's Balk ? | PABlue | Baseball | 27 | Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:47am |
Catcher's Balk | andrewm | Baseball | 10 | Fri Jun 30, 2006 02:27pm |
Catcher's Balk | chsbasebal | Baseball | 18 | Tue Nov 06, 2001 09:43pm |