The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 14, 2003, 11:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1
This is in a league for 11 - 13 year olds. We had a batter hit by pitch, the umpire awarded him first base, the hitter declined the award to first base and wanted to continue his at bat in hope of the opportunity of a hit. The umpire allowed him to continue his at bat and ignored the fact he was hit by pitch. Is this correct? I've never had a situation where a hit batsman did not accept first base.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 14, 2003, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
He doesn't get a choice. He goes.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 14, 2003, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
I have heard that long ago the batter had that option in MLB. I suspect that today's pitchers would take it as an insult and deliberately hit the guy with the next pitch.

Until around 1950, the home team in MLB had the option to bat first, but I don't know that any ever did.

It does bring up other questions. In the early 1960s, Hector Lopez hit a game-winning ground rule double but ran no farther than first, so he was credited only with a single. What if today a runner between 2B and 3B was awarded home but opted to stop at 3B (let's say, because the next batter was chasing an RBI record)? I suspect the runner would not be allowed that option.

In lower-level girls' rec FP, I often ask hit batters whether they want to stay and bat. They almost always choose to bat.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 14, 2003, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 19
I have done this in lower levels a couple of times. Both times, I couldn't tell if the pitch grazed the batter so I asked him " did that pitch hit you?" Answer " Yes, but I want to bat." Games were blow outs and the hitter was on the losing team. I figure if they want to bat, let them do it in lower levels. Competitive levels, take your base.
Glen is right about the girls, they almost always want to hit. I think giving the option of taking the base or hitting should be incorporated in some leagues. We have what is known here as a Concurrent League. This is a developmental league with interleague games. No standings are kept and coaches are encouraged to allow players to play positions they normally wouldn't play in league play. Basically a practice game league. I see no reason why kids shouldn't hit if they want to in this league. That is one of the major thrills in baseball.


__________________
Gordon Raney
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 14, 2003, 07:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 508
Wink

I have had some varsity players get grazed. I call time and send em to first, they argue that they didn't get hit! Kids love to smack the ball, can't blame em.....
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 15, 2003, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
I also have had some player get grazed and act as if they didn't get hit. I let it stand. Many, many times it has resulted in an out.

I always make sure to thank the player.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1