The runners, knowing this is potentially a live ball begin to advance to next base.
What is this supposed to mean? Did you think an IFF was a dead ball situation?
Or did you think that a dropped IFF forced the runners?
Rita
rbmartin
Tue Sep 27, 2011 06:31am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rita C
(Post 790028)
What is this supposed to mean? Did you think an IFF was a dead ball situation?
Or did you think that a dropped IFF forced the runners?
Rita
I am well aware that an infield fly is a live ball and runners may attempt to advance at their own peril. It's just that only about half youngsters playing ball today know this.
MD Longhorn
Tue Sep 27, 2011 08:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin
(Post 790007)
Does 7.09(f) require intent?
No, of course not... but why are you quoting this particular rule? It doesn't apply here. By intent, I meant intent to prevent a double play. I don't really see one here, given the IFF removing all forces already - but I suppose it's possible.
Rita C
Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:20am
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin
(Post 790064)
I am well aware that an infield fly is a live ball and runners may attempt to advance at their own peril. It's just that only about half youngsters playing ball today know this.
Didn't sound like it.
Rita
DG
Wed Sep 28, 2011 09:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeStrybel
(Post 789881)
You stated that the ball was in fair territory when contacted, right? The umpire correctly announced the call, the batter is out if the ball is fair. By rule, it became fair when contacted by the BR. He was out the instant he touched it, either way. Because he interfered with the potential live ball, it is dead and the runners return to their bases. Smart pitcher. One of my 11U kids this year tried to glove a similar pop up. It hit the heel of his glove while fair and rolled into DBT. Ouch.
Why is this smart pitcher? If it rolls foul without being touched it is foul, vs. catch it for an out, or at least touch it in fair territory. Catch it is best option.
