The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   1st to 3rd PO MOVE (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/66381-1st-3rd-po-move.html)

JFlores Wed Apr 06, 2011 03:44pm

3rd to 1st move
 
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 03:55pm

Jflores,

On a 1st to 3rd pickoff move by an engaged pitcher, I've got a balk every time, regardless of what he does with the ball.

JM

jicecone Wed Apr 06, 2011 04:58pm

"Very elemantary" however, JM is right. Any feint to first will result in a balk, directly from the plate. Now if the pitcher happens to feint first towards third, then goes to first, the only requirement is a step to the bag. Arm motion is not required and therefore it doesn't matter where the ball is.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 05:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 747521)
"Very elemantary" however, JM is right. Any feint to first will result in a balk, directly from the plate. Now if the pitcher happens to feint first towards third, then goes to first, the only requirement is a step to the bag. Arm motion is not required and therefore it doesn't matter where the ball is.

Well I certainly wouldn't argue with any of THAT!

The one additional caveat I might offer is that....

1. If they are playing under FED rules,
2. And the pitcher remains "engaged" as he feints to 3rd then turns to 1st,
3. Then he MUST make a "legal step" AND throw on the move to 1st,
4. So, at some point, he's going to have take the ball out of his glove - and he'd best do it "continuously" and "without interruption".

JM

ozzy6900 Wed Apr 06, 2011 06:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFlores (Post 747510)
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

ROTFLMAO! 1st to 3rd move? LOL!

mbyron Wed Apr 06, 2011 06:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747524)

1. If they are playing under FED rules,
2. And the pitcher remains "engaged" as he feints to 3rd then turns to 1st,
3. Then he MUST make a "legal step" AND throw on the move to 1st,
4. So, at some point, he's going to have take the ball out of his glove - and he'd best do it "continuously" and "without interruption".

Around here, no matter what the feet actually do, once he steps toward 3B he is off the rubber and disengaged.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 07:02pm

Michael,

While that does have a certain appeal to me, personally, I can't help but wonder what you would call should the pitcher...

Quote:

... with runners on first and third, ... while in contact with the rubber, steps toward third and then immediately and in practically the same motion “wheels” and throws to first base, ...
and successfully picks off the R1.

Me, in an OBR or NCAA game, I would balk that in a New York minute.

In a FED game, it's explicitly legal (though I have no idea why they thought this would be a good rule).

So, if the F1 is given this "innovative" advantage, I would also hold him to the FED "constraint" should he make the same move, but fail to throw - a balk.

JM

mbyron Wed Apr 06, 2011 07:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747560)
Michael,

While that does have a certain appeal to me, personally, I can't help but wonder what you would call should the pitcher...



and successfully picks off the R1.

Me, in an OBR or NCAA game, I would balk that in a New York minute.

In a FED game, it's explicitly legal (though I have no idea why they thought this would be a good rule).

So, if the F1 is given this "innovative" advantage, I would also hold him to the FED "constraint" should he make the same move, but fail to throw - a balk.

JM

The "expected" call here is to no-call this under any code.

I actually think this is in the spirit of the rule. I don't see that F1 gets any advantage from the FED rule. An R1 who sees F1 move toward 3B and doesn't get back to 1B, IMO, richly deserves whatever he gets.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 08:45pm

Michael,

I doubt that we would enforce it differently if we saw the same thing.

But I actually believe the language I quote from the text of the OBR rules describing a pitcher's illegal move does mean something.

And, were you to use your imagination, I'm guessing you could picture a move where the pitcher does a "double step" off of his pivot foot - not a "normal" 3rd to 1st move, mind you - that you would deem violating both the letter and the spirit of the balk proscriptions as well.

Go ahead. Wherever you are - your family room, some near-campus bar trying to pick up coeds, the library, whatever - just try it.

Almost like a preliminary "jab step" towards 3B, only with the free foot instead of the pivot. Just enough to gain "distance and direction" in the direction of 3B with the free foot, but not enough to compromise your balance nor the leverage of your pivot foot as you then quickly "wheel" to 1B to pick off the runner there.

As the famous umpire Thomas Stearns Eliot once sagely observed,

Quote:

...

Words strain,
Crack and sometimes break, under the burden,
Under the tension, slip, slide, perish,
Decay with imprecision, ...
so I may not be conveying what I'm envisioning in a way that creates the same picture in your mind. But, if you believe what I'm picturing is legal, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Because, of course, I'm right and you're wrong. ;)

JM

JFlores Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:17pm

Sorry I am an idiot, meant third to first move. I would've edited the thread title but don't know how.

mbyron Thu Apr 07, 2011 07:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747590)
Michael,

I doubt that we would enforce it differently if we saw the same thing.

But I actually believe the language I quote from the text of the OBR rules describing a pitcher's illegal move does mean something.

And, were you to use your imagination, I'm guessing you could picture a move where the pitcher does a "double step" off of his pivot foot - not a "normal" 3rd to 1st move, mind you - that you would deem violating both the letter and the spirit of the balk proscriptions as well.

Go ahead. Wherever you are - your family room, some near-campus bar trying to pick up coeds, the library, whatever - just try it.

Almost like a preliminary "jab step" towards 3B, only with the free foot instead of the pivot. Just enough to gain "distance and direction" in the direction of 3B with the free foot, but not enough to compromise your balance nor the leverage of your pivot foot as you then quickly "wheel" to 1B to pick off the runner there.

As the famous umpire Thomas Stearns Eliot once sagely observed,



so I may not be conveying what I'm envisioning in a way that creates the same picture in your mind. But, if you believe what I'm picturing is legal, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Because, of course, I'm right and you're wrong. ;)

JM

Bravo, maestro! Pure artistry, that post. :)

UmpJM Thu Apr 07, 2011 09:37am

Michael,

Why, thank you. :o

To be fair, we here in Illinois generally consider his foot to have come off the rubber on the move to 3rd as well. ;)

JM

Simply The Best Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747731)
To be fair, we here in Illinois generally consider his foot to have come off the rubber on the move to 3rd as well. ;)

Why not call it properly? :confused: If the foot is engaged - balk. If not, no balk.

DG Thu Apr 07, 2011 09:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFlores (Post 747510)
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

The title of your post is 3rd to 1st, your text in teh question is 1st to 3rd, huge difference.

UmpJM Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 747876)
The title of your post is 3rd to 1st, your text in teh question is 1st to 3rd, huge difference.

DG,

It certainly is.

And I would like to just "go on the record" and apologize to JFlores for taking shameless advantage of his innocent "typo" in order to shamelessly and gratuitously indulge my unfortunate penchant to engage in puerile sarcasm when it was perfectly clear from the "get go" what he was asking.

I'm sorry. I just couldn't help it. :rolleyes:

JM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1