The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   1st to 3rd PO MOVE (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/66381-1st-3rd-po-move.html)

JFlores Wed Apr 06, 2011 03:44pm

3rd to 1st move
 
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 03:55pm

Jflores,

On a 1st to 3rd pickoff move by an engaged pitcher, I've got a balk every time, regardless of what he does with the ball.

JM

jicecone Wed Apr 06, 2011 04:58pm

"Very elemantary" however, JM is right. Any feint to first will result in a balk, directly from the plate. Now if the pitcher happens to feint first towards third, then goes to first, the only requirement is a step to the bag. Arm motion is not required and therefore it doesn't matter where the ball is.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 05:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 747521)
"Very elemantary" however, JM is right. Any feint to first will result in a balk, directly from the plate. Now if the pitcher happens to feint first towards third, then goes to first, the only requirement is a step to the bag. Arm motion is not required and therefore it doesn't matter where the ball is.

Well I certainly wouldn't argue with any of THAT!

The one additional caveat I might offer is that....

1. If they are playing under FED rules,
2. And the pitcher remains "engaged" as he feints to 3rd then turns to 1st,
3. Then he MUST make a "legal step" AND throw on the move to 1st,
4. So, at some point, he's going to have take the ball out of his glove - and he'd best do it "continuously" and "without interruption".

JM

ozzy6900 Wed Apr 06, 2011 06:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFlores (Post 747510)
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

ROTFLMAO! 1st to 3rd move? LOL!

mbyron Wed Apr 06, 2011 06:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747524)

1. If they are playing under FED rules,
2. And the pitcher remains "engaged" as he feints to 3rd then turns to 1st,
3. Then he MUST make a "legal step" AND throw on the move to 1st,
4. So, at some point, he's going to have take the ball out of his glove - and he'd best do it "continuously" and "without interruption".

Around here, no matter what the feet actually do, once he steps toward 3B he is off the rubber and disengaged.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 07:02pm

Michael,

While that does have a certain appeal to me, personally, I can't help but wonder what you would call should the pitcher...

Quote:

... with runners on first and third, ... while in contact with the rubber, steps toward third and then immediately and in practically the same motion “wheels” and throws to first base, ...
and successfully picks off the R1.

Me, in an OBR or NCAA game, I would balk that in a New York minute.

In a FED game, it's explicitly legal (though I have no idea why they thought this would be a good rule).

So, if the F1 is given this "innovative" advantage, I would also hold him to the FED "constraint" should he make the same move, but fail to throw - a balk.

JM

mbyron Wed Apr 06, 2011 07:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747560)
Michael,

While that does have a certain appeal to me, personally, I can't help but wonder what you would call should the pitcher...



and successfully picks off the R1.

Me, in an OBR or NCAA game, I would balk that in a New York minute.

In a FED game, it's explicitly legal (though I have no idea why they thought this would be a good rule).

So, if the F1 is given this "innovative" advantage, I would also hold him to the FED "constraint" should he make the same move, but fail to throw - a balk.

JM

The "expected" call here is to no-call this under any code.

I actually think this is in the spirit of the rule. I don't see that F1 gets any advantage from the FED rule. An R1 who sees F1 move toward 3B and doesn't get back to 1B, IMO, richly deserves whatever he gets.

UmpJM Wed Apr 06, 2011 08:45pm

Michael,

I doubt that we would enforce it differently if we saw the same thing.

But I actually believe the language I quote from the text of the OBR rules describing a pitcher's illegal move does mean something.

And, were you to use your imagination, I'm guessing you could picture a move where the pitcher does a "double step" off of his pivot foot - not a "normal" 3rd to 1st move, mind you - that you would deem violating both the letter and the spirit of the balk proscriptions as well.

Go ahead. Wherever you are - your family room, some near-campus bar trying to pick up coeds, the library, whatever - just try it.

Almost like a preliminary "jab step" towards 3B, only with the free foot instead of the pivot. Just enough to gain "distance and direction" in the direction of 3B with the free foot, but not enough to compromise your balance nor the leverage of your pivot foot as you then quickly "wheel" to 1B to pick off the runner there.

As the famous umpire Thomas Stearns Eliot once sagely observed,

Quote:

...

Words strain,
Crack and sometimes break, under the burden,
Under the tension, slip, slide, perish,
Decay with imprecision, ...
so I may not be conveying what I'm envisioning in a way that creates the same picture in your mind. But, if you believe what I'm picturing is legal, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Because, of course, I'm right and you're wrong. ;)

JM

JFlores Wed Apr 06, 2011 10:17pm

Sorry I am an idiot, meant third to first move. I would've edited the thread title but don't know how.

mbyron Thu Apr 07, 2011 07:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747590)
Michael,

I doubt that we would enforce it differently if we saw the same thing.

But I actually believe the language I quote from the text of the OBR rules describing a pitcher's illegal move does mean something.

And, were you to use your imagination, I'm guessing you could picture a move where the pitcher does a "double step" off of his pivot foot - not a "normal" 3rd to 1st move, mind you - that you would deem violating both the letter and the spirit of the balk proscriptions as well.

Go ahead. Wherever you are - your family room, some near-campus bar trying to pick up coeds, the library, whatever - just try it.

Almost like a preliminary "jab step" towards 3B, only with the free foot instead of the pivot. Just enough to gain "distance and direction" in the direction of 3B with the free foot, but not enough to compromise your balance nor the leverage of your pivot foot as you then quickly "wheel" to 1B to pick off the runner there.

As the famous umpire Thomas Stearns Eliot once sagely observed,



so I may not be conveying what I'm envisioning in a way that creates the same picture in your mind. But, if you believe what I'm picturing is legal, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Because, of course, I'm right and you're wrong. ;)

JM

Bravo, maestro! Pure artistry, that post. :)

UmpJM Thu Apr 07, 2011 09:37am

Michael,

Why, thank you. :o

To be fair, we here in Illinois generally consider his foot to have come off the rubber on the move to 3rd as well. ;)

JM

Simply The Best Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747731)
To be fair, we here in Illinois generally consider his foot to have come off the rubber on the move to 3rd as well. ;)

Why not call it properly? :confused: If the foot is engaged - balk. If not, no balk.

DG Thu Apr 07, 2011 09:45pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFlores (Post 747510)
Very Elementary, sorry just need clarification. On 1st to third move, Pitcher steps to third and feints a throw, ball can stay in glove correct?

The title of your post is 3rd to 1st, your text in teh question is 1st to 3rd, huge difference.

UmpJM Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 747876)
The title of your post is 3rd to 1st, your text in teh question is 1st to 3rd, huge difference.

DG,

It certainly is.

And I would like to just "go on the record" and apologize to JFlores for taking shameless advantage of his innocent "typo" in order to shamelessly and gratuitously indulge my unfortunate penchant to engage in puerile sarcasm when it was perfectly clear from the "get go" what he was asking.

I'm sorry. I just couldn't help it. :rolleyes:

JM

SanDiegoSteve Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply The Best (Post 747736)
Why not call it properly? :confused: If the foot is engaged - balk. If not, no balk.

It has been determined in many other discussions on this and other forums, that it is next to impossible to feign to 3rd, turn, and feign or throw to 1st, without the pivot foot coming off the rubber, even just a tiny bit. That is why he is considered to have disengaged after the feint to 3rd.

The pitcher is not allowed by rule to step toward 3rd, and with practically the same motion spin and throw to 1st. Two separate moves are required, and the physics dictate that the pitcher has disengaged the rubber in order to satisfy that rule.

Simply The Best Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:55am

Originally Posted by Simply The Best http://forum.officiating.com/images/...s/viewpost.gif
Why not call it properly? :confused: If the foot is engaged - balk. If not, no balk.
Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 747902)
It has been determined in many other discussions on this and other forums, that it is next to impossible to feign to 3rd, turn, and feign or throw to 1st, without the pivot foot coming off the rubber, even just a tiny bit. That is why he is considered to have disengaged after the feint to 3rd.

Then it is probable which is why I said what I did.

Hint: There are many, many others who have seen F1 feign to 3rd in contact with the rubber eventually turning and throwing to 1st. Try it. It's easy! ;) Call the game, don't succumb to accepting carte blanche umpire mythologies regardless of how often they are repeated! ;)

DG Fri Apr 08, 2011 08:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 747878)
And I would like to just "go on the record" and apologize to JFlores for taking shameless advantage of his innocent "typo" in order to shamelessly and gratuitously indulge my unfortunate penchant to engage in puerile sarcasm when it was perfectly clear from the "get go" what he was asking.

Learned a new word today... Had to look it up...puerile.

MrUmpire Fri Apr 08, 2011 08:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 748191)
Learned a new word today... Had to look it up...puerile.

I've been using Puerile to disinfect my hands for years...ever since I saw it in my doctor's office.

SanDiegoSteve Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:23am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply The Best (Post 748054)
Originally Posted by Simply The Best http://forum.officiating.com/images/...s/viewpost.gif
Why not call it properly? :confused: If the foot is engaged - balk. If not, no balk.
Then it is probable which is why I said what I did.

Hint: There are many, many others who have seen F1 feign to 3rd in contact with the rubber eventually turning and throwing to 1st. Try it. It's easy! ;) Call the game, don't succumb to accepting carte blanche umpire mythologies regardless of how often they are repeated! ;)

Let's see here...I've been doing this for 25 years, and calling this play the EXACT same way it's called at every level of baseball throughout the entire world. Not one time has a coach or player even uttered a syllable in protest of such a call. Now you come along and tell ALL of us that we've been doing it wrong all this time. Wow, you must be the BEST umpire EVER!

I never accepted any "myths" about the game of baseball. This is not a myth, it's physics. In order to perform the move you describe, the pitcher would have to feign to 3rd, drag his pivot foot on the ground as he spins around to throw to 1st, and I've NEVER ONCE seen a pitcher do this. They 100% of the time lift their pivot foot off the rubber when turning to throw to 1st. I will let you know the VERY FIRST TIME I see someone stay in total contact with the rubber on this move.

UmpJM Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:41am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 748191)
Learned a new word today... Had to look it up...puerile.

DG,

As always, I blame the Jesuits!

I actually had a "1st to 3rd" pick-off move in a game last year, and I'll tell ya', it was kind of WEIRD.

Very early season HS Varsity game, around the 3rd inning, tall, lanky LHP on the mound, R1 & R3 with 1 out. I'm on the bases.

The F1 initiates a decent move to 1B, and as I am stepping up and pivoting to call the play at 1st, he very "smoothly" fakes a throw to 1st and begins pivoting back to 3rd.

As I am nimbly pivoting back towards 3rd following his motion, I am thinking something like, "Ahhh. The old 1st to 3rd... WTF? He can't do THAT!" before I manage to sputter, "THAT'S A BALK!" in a tone that might be characterized as "surprised indignation".

Thankfully, the move had apparently "brain-locked" the OHC in the 3rd base coaching box a bit as well, because I managed to beat his outraged complaint by about a tenth of a second, and he morphed it into a "Thank YOU" that really conveyed more of a "About freakin' TIME" sense than any sort of true gratitude.

PU never said "Jack".

The pitcher just kind of "hung his head" and shook it in a "What was I thinking?" kind of way.

Like I said, it was kind of weird.

JM

bob jenkins Sat Apr 09, 2011 05:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 748354)
Let's see here...I've been doing this for 25 years, and calling this play the EXACT same way it's called at every level of baseball throughout the entire world. Not one time has a coach or player even uttered a syllable in protest of such a call. Now you come along and tell ALL of us that we've been doing it wrong all this time. Wow, you must be the BEST umpire EVER!

I never accepted any "myths" about the game of baseball. This is not a myth, it's physics. In order to perform the move you describe, the pitcher would have to feign to 3rd, drag his pivot foot on the ground as he spins around to throw to 1st, and I've NEVER ONCE seen a pitcher do this. They 100% of the time lift their pivot foot off the rubber when turning to throw to 1st. I will let you know the VERY FIRST TIME I see someone stay in total contact with the rubber on this move.

I've seen it once, but (HS) F1 threw to first.

The point is, imo, call this one according to the rule -- if (OBR?NCAA) F1 fails to come off the rubber, balk it. If (HS) F1 stays on the rubber and feints, balk it.

Benefit of the doubt to the pitcher, though.

mbyron Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UmpJM (nee CoachJM) (Post 748363)
The pitcher just kind of "hung his head" and shook it in a "What was I thinking?" kind of way.

Like I said, it was kind of weird.

JM

F1 was probably ambidextrous, and it worked just fine when he faced the other way. :D

Simply The Best Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 748354)
Wow, you must be the BEST umpire EVER!

Thanks!:D
Quote:

I never accepted any "myths" about the game of baseball. This is not a myth, it's physics. In order to perform the move you describe,
I'm sorry I described no move, you must be confused.:confused:
Quote:

<sds now="" describes="">his interpretation of one of many possible moves> the pitcher would have to feign to 3rd, drag his pivot foot on the ground as he spins around to throw to 1st, and I've NEVER ONCE seen a pitcher do this. They 100% of the time lift their pivot foot off the rubber when turning to throw to 1st. I will let you know the VERY FIRST TIME I see someone stay in total contact with the rubber on this move.
Thanks, no need; I doubt you will ever see that move since if in 25 years you have yet to. I have seen it several times.

So you don't mind if I do not hold my breath or anxiously await your notification.;)</sds>

Simply The Best Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 748438)
I've seen it once, but (HS) F1 threw to first.

Likewise.
Quote:

The point is, imo, call this one according to the rule -- if (OBR?NCAA) F1 fails to come off the rubber, balk it. If (HS) F1 stays on the rubber and feints, balk it.
Correct, very simple, it it is a balk, call a balk. No need to automatically allow any move; umpire mythologies at work when you do.

DG Sun Apr 10, 2011 05:01pm

The example shown in Evans Balk video is pretty clear, the pitcher faked then turned and threw to first without disengaging. In the example shown it is easy to see. In actual fact though, it rarely if ever happens that way, there is always space between foot and rubber on the feint and turn.

Simply The Best Mon Apr 11, 2011 01:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 748692)
The example shown in Evans Balk video is pretty clear, the pitcher faked then turned and threw to first without disengaging.

BALK!
Quote:

In the example shown it is easy to see. In actual fact though, it rarely if ever happens that way, there is always space between foot and rubber on the feint and turn.
No call.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1