The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Another one

I didn't see the game, but the article just appeared on the web, and I don't see that anyone posted anything about it yet.

Regrets? Umpire has a few after costly blown call against Tigers - Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Big League Stew Mon Jun 28 06:21am PDT

"We already know umpires are human. If umps apologize too frequently, we'll begin to think they're extremely flawed humans who need to be replaced with Extreme Robot Umpire Overlords who are fitted the latest QuesTec software.

So, just get the calls right in the first place — that way you have no need to say you're sorry.

Or fix the call if you make a mistake and then apologize for messing up. That would be an apology with some value.

Or just make the call and live with it. Keep your mea culpas to yourselves, please.

No more Mr. Sorry Guy."


I couldn't agree more.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 01:09pm
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
But what if the pitch was balled and it could've been a strike?

Should he bring the guy back and say..."I know I called ball, but the more I think about it, it was a strike."

Or are we talking only about game ending strikes that should've been balls?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 01:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Honestly, I saw this on TV, and while it looked a bit outside, it was also curving out - where the catcher caught it was way outside, but I'm still not positive this missed the plate - and certainly not egregiously. I'm VERY surprised to hear an apology on this one. Save the I'm Sorry's for the truly historical mistakes, and live by your call the other 99.999% of the time.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 01:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyg08 View Post
But what if the pitch was balled and it could've been a strike?

Should he bring the guy back and say..."I know I called ball, but the more I think about it, it was a strike."

Or are we talking only about game ending strikes that should've been balls?
You know ... one pet peeve of mine when watching MLB (and ONLY MLB - I don't see this problem in NCAA games or even MiLB games) is that the umpires seem to have forgotten what's drummed into the rest of us constantly... See it... think it ... THEN call it. Seems the MLB guys (or a lot of them at least), while being far superior to us in every other way, have this bizarre need to make BIG calls - and to make them big, they make them FAST - especially the bangers at first, and ESPECIALLY strike three called. This was one example. If it really was ball four (still not sure it was), then if he's not so eager to make the SuperLoud PunchOut call - perhaps he gets this one right. We are told 100 times a year, until we don't have to be - SLOW DOWN.

Maybe it's just me.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 751
David Brown is the typical thin skinned sportswriter that loves to criticize, but hates criticism.

His premise that an umpire should change a call is consistent with someone who spends all his free time playing fantasy sports or computer "what if" games.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 02:57pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
honestly, i saw this on tv, and while it looked a bit outside, it was also curving out - where the catcher caught it was way outside, but i'm still not positive this missed the plate - and certainly not egregiously. I'm very surprised to hear an apology on this one. Save the i'm sorry's for the truly historical mistakes, and live by your call the other 99.999% of the time.
+1
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 28, 2010, 11:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 33
It was outside all the way and never had a chance to catch any of the plate. The camera is right in line with the mound and the plate and it was waaay outside. Even Greg Maddux thought it was several inches wide. This was no reward for "hitting the glove". The catcher had to reach to pick it. Ugh. Ball four scores the tieing run. Bad time to give the too-wide strike.

And, while embarassing on replay, I agree that no apology should be offered. A public apology serves no purpose here.


They kicked another one in the next day's game and Leyland got tossed arguing it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 07:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven K View Post
The camera is right in line with the mound and the plate
I doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven K View Post
The camera is right in line with the mound and the plate and it was waaay outside.
First time around the mulberry patch? Watch again.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 08:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
I'm sure Greg Maddux would have had no issue with that strike call.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 09:24am
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven K View Post
Even Greg Maddux thought it was several inches wide.
Well if Greg Maddux said so...
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
He only said that from the comfort of retirement. In his heyday, he made millions of dollars from pitches just like that.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 12:19pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
Yeah but it's Greg Maddux. He's like the Chuck Norris of baseball.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 29, 2010, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Greg Maddux once threw a bad pitch, just to see what it felt like.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1