Question From a Fan Re Hit By Pitch
 

Saw something happen today in an MLB game that raised a question in my mind:

Braves/Phillies: With a runner at first base, a Phillies batter may or may not have gotten grazed by a pitch. The ball got away to the screen, and the runner at 1st went to 2nd while the home plate ump told the batter to go to first on the hit by pitch. After Bobby Cox questioned the call, all four umpires gathered, and it was determined that it did not hit him. The batter was brought back to home plate to continue the at bat.

Meanwhile, the runner stayed at 2B. Now, ultimately, he deserved 2B because the ball got by the catcher to the screen, and the Braves had no play on him. But, I got to thinking about something: When the umpire called the hit by pitch, did he not create a dead ball? In other words, would this not be similar to the old inadvertent whistle in football where he killed the ball by calling the hit by pitch?

More information...was it a check swing? In terms of getting the play right. If the ball hit him or not the runner would've achieved 2B. If they left him there, they got the play right.

No. He made no effort to swing at it. As the pitch got past the catcher, the plate umpire raised his hands and pointed to 1B (just like you always see umpires do on a hit by pitch). When Cox questioned it, the plate ump called the other three guys in. After they talked, they decided to bring the batter back and left the runner at 2B.

If you undo the HBP you undo the dead ball. So the runner gets 2B on the WP.

I don't see the problem, even the announcers got it right. No HBP, R1 advances on the wild pitch, Charlie M gets a runner at second and still finds a way to get ejected. What a marooon.

Houston Pitcher Roy Oswald got ejected in the 3rd inning yesterday for allegedly arguing balls and strikes (he said he was just mad at himself and not talking to the ump). His team went on to lose 14-4........

It's Oswalt...

Two fans also got tossed for running onto the field. I'm guessing that they and Roy just didn't want to be around any longer - although watching a 4-run outpouring from that offense would have been worth watching - a rare occurence indeed.

For all those who did not see the game, here is a link to the incident (including the subsequent ejection)
Charlie Manuel Ejected on an overturned HBP

Thanks for the correction, my bad.

Certainly more common than the "9 spot" hung on the board by the Nats - their first ever as non-Expos! ;)

This is correct. I had almost the exact thing last weekend. With R2, I thought a low pitch grazed the batter, called Time as the ball went to the backstop. It rebounded back to F2, but R2 had already reached 3rd, so there was no possible play. Both the batter and F2 said that the ball didn't hit the batter, so I reversed the HBP and left R2 at 3rd, much to the displeasure of F2.

So why was Oswalt pointing at and walking towards HPU Bill Hohn and saying , "That one's on you. That one's on you".

No brainer ejection. You could tell Oswalt was fixing to get the heave ho.

What thread you responding to?

Back to this one, I don't think I have ever called a HBP and then reversed after discussion with partner. Can't say I have ever missed one that was convinced by partner after discussion either. If he saw it he should have called it if I did not. That is a pregame item, the previous is not.

If in doubt watch the batter, see what he does, if he starts trotting 1B you have decision to make, if not he help you make decision.