The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Another Balk? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/58135-another-balk.html)

Steven Tyler Sun May 16, 2010 01:29pm

Another Balk?
 
I saw this one in an A's/Rangers game last week.

Situation: R3 only and pitcher in the set position on the rubber. LHB, so F5 is playing a good distance from the bag. Ian Kinsler (R3) gets a good lead and starts like he is going to take off for home. Gio Gonzalez (F1) steps back off the rubber and makes what is very wild throw towards home that F2 doesn't even have a chance to catch. I'm sure he was trying to throw the ball so that F2 would have a chance on a play at the plate. Yep you guessed it, a balk was called by U1, our very own "Balk A Day" Bob Davidson. My guess was that he would have called the balk for simulating a pitch.

However, it looked to me as if Gonzalez just stepped off and was making what would have been a quick normal throw to retire a runner, abliet wildly. Just because Kinsler retreated back to 3B, I don't see any issue why a balk was called.

Did "Balk A Day" get it wrong, or am I missing something here? If the pitcher disengages the rubber first, can't he just throw it anywhere? It didn't really matter since Kinsler would have scored on the wild throw anyway.

mrm21711 Sun May 16, 2010 02:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 677081)
I saw this one in an A's/Rangers game last week.

Situation: R3 only and pitcher in the set position on the rubber. LHB, so F5 is playing a good distance from the bag. Ian Kinsler (R3) gets a good lead and starts like he is going to take off for home. Gio Gonzalez (F1) steps back off the rubber and makes what is very wild throw towards home that F2 doesn't even have a chance to catch. I'm sure he was trying to throw the ball so that F2 would have a chance on a play at the plate. Yep you guessed it, a balk was called by U1, our very own "Balk A Day" Bob Davidson. My guess was that he would have called the balk for simulating a pitch.

However, it looked to me as if Gonzalez just stepped off and was making what would have been a quick normal throw to retire a runner, abliet wildly. Just because Kinsler retreated back to 3B, I don't see any issue why a balk was called.

Did "Balk A Day" get it wrong, or am I missing something here? If the pitcher disengages the rubber first, can't he just throw it anywhere? It didn't really matter since Kinsler would have scored on the wild throw anyway.

I was watching it and I feel like Davidson might have gotten him on buckling his right knee. I sure as hell couldnt tell for sure though.

Rich Ives Sun May 16, 2010 04:41pm

Throwing to an unoccupied base. Because the attempt was a feint it is not considered a play.

DG Sun May 16, 2010 08:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 677101)
Throwing to an unoccupied base. Because the attempt was a feint it is not considered a play.

Or, throwing a pitch, not from the rubber. Granted, I have not seen it so don't know.

johnnyg08 Sun May 16, 2010 09:04pm

Looks like MLB changed their site...it's looking like it's tougher to search for these plays. Bummer. Anybody else having better luck?

johnnyg08 Sun May 16, 2010 09:19pm

Here's the video clip...finally found it.

Pretty clearly shows that he started his pitching motion, then stepped off and threw home. First few angles are not very good...watch until the end.

Baseball Video Highlights & Clips | OAK@TEX: Kinsler scores on an Oakland balk - Video | MLB.com: Multimedia

jdmara Sun May 16, 2010 09:39pm

That is clearly a balk. He started his windup and then stepped off. I can't figure out why the PU signaled something intangible

-Josh

mrm21711 Sun May 16, 2010 09:46pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrm21711 (Post 677091)
I was watching it and I feel like Davidson might have gotten him on buckling his right knee. I sure as hell couldnt tell for sure though.

My apologies....my response was for the balk Davidson called this afternoon in the Twins-Yankees game.

Rich Ives Sun May 16, 2010 09:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 677123)
Or, throwing a pitch, not from the rubber. Granted, I have not seen it so don't know.

WHen Ellsbury stole home on Pettitte last year Pettitte just stepped back and then threw home. No balk. Too late on the throw.

johnnyg08 Sun May 16, 2010 10:34pm

Spammer be gone

SanDiegoSteve Mon May 17, 2010 06:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 677081)
I saw this one in an A's/Rangers game last week.

Situation: R3 only and pitcher in the set position on the rubber. LHB, so F5 is playing a good distance from the bag. Ian Kinsler (R3) gets a good lead and starts like he is going to take off for home. Gio Gonzalez (F1) steps back off the rubber and makes what is very wild throw towards home that F2 doesn't even have a chance to catch. I'm sure he was trying to throw the ball so that F2 would have a chance on a play at the plate. Yep you guessed it, a balk was called by U1, our very own "Balk A Day" Bob Davidson. My guess was that he would have called the balk for simulating a pitch.

However, it looked to me as if Gonzalez just stepped off and was making what would have been a quick normal throw to retire a runner, abliet wildly. Just because Kinsler retreated back to 3B, I don't see any issue why a balk was called.

Did "Balk A Day" get it wrong, or am I missing something here? If the pitcher disengages the rubber first, can't he just throw it anywhere? It didn't really matter since Kinsler would have scored on the wild throw anyway.

The pitcher was in the Windup Position, not the Set Position. Once he started his motion, he had to continue with the pitch. He cannot step off and throw at this point. The balk call was correct. Either way, by balk or wild pitch, that run is going to score anyway.

What I thought was typically bush was the announcer claiming that the Rangers had been "victimized" lately by overruled umpire calls. Poor Rangers:rolleyes:.

bob jenkins Mon May 17, 2010 08:09am

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyg08 (Post 677142)
Spammer be gone

Please do not respond / post / quote the spam, nor "report" it.

Responses just encourage the postings and reports just clog up my in-box (if I miss something for a day or so, then report it).

And, to be clear, even though I'm quoting johnnyg08, I'm not directing this only at him.

Thanks

TwoBits Mon May 17, 2010 10:14am

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdmara (Post 677131)
That is clearly a balk. He started his windup and then stepped off. I can't figure out why the PU signaled something intangible

-Josh

That, and why the need for the umpires to get together on this?

jdmara Mon May 17, 2010 10:35am

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwoBits (Post 677197)
That, and why the need for the umpires to get together on this?

I wish I knew the answer. Maybe they were figuring out who was buying the first round

-Josh

GA Umpire Mon May 17, 2010 11:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwoBits (Post 677197)
That, and why the need for the umpires to get together on this?

The only thing I can figure is what the call is and who is calling it. A balk or a wild pitch? And, possibly the count?

What was Tschida's motion of throwing up his hands? Is that a mechanic or what? And, I am legitimately asking. No smilies here.

JJ Mon May 17, 2010 01:05pm

I don't think Tschida called a balk...hence the "odd" arm motions and I think that's why he huddled up with the crew. Balk = no pitch. No balk = a ball added to the count. He wanted to find out if another umpire had called a balk so the scorekeeping was correct.

JJ

Altor Tue May 18, 2010 08:36am

Looked to me like he was lackadaisically telling the runner he was safe.

I agree, it was a strange motion.

Steven Tyler Tue May 18, 2010 11:48pm

Well,
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 677162)
The pitcher was in the Windup Position, not the Set Position.

Then why was his whole non-pivot foot way in front of the rubber?

At the game and saw it on the jumbotron. He looked like he was in the set position to me.

Dollar hot dog night on Wednesday home games. Will be there for the Angels game tomorrow, also....:rolleyes:

SanDiegoSteve Wed May 19, 2010 01:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 677438)
Then why was his whole non-pivot foot way in front of the rubber?

At the game and saw it on the jumbotron. He looked like he was in the set position to me.

Dollar hot dog night on Wednesday home games. Will be there for the Angels game tomorrow, also....:rolleyes:

It's just the goofy way he stands, but he clearly started his motion by dropping his non-pivot foot back behind the rubber and winding up with his hands together.

Don't eat too many hot dogs or you will get fat. Trust me on that one!;)

Steven Tyler Wed May 19, 2010 05:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 677442)
It's just the goofy way he stands, but he clearly started his motion by dropping his non-pivot foot back behind the rubber and winding up with his hands together.

Don't eat too many hot dogs or you will get fat. Trust me on that one!;)

Correct, he did start his motion to home before he stepped off. It was hard to tell from where I was sitting what did transpire. I caught a little of it on the jumbotron. I was mostly baffled by what was going on on the field, what with the huddle and such.

I couldn't access a video, but from the one that was provided, it was clearly a balk.

Steven Tyler Fri May 21, 2010 06:56pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 677162)
What I thought was typically bush was the announcer claiming that the Rangers had been "victimized" lately by overruled umpire calls. Poor Rangers:rolleyes:.


When you see calls such as another "boner" by Doug Eddings, you might see their point.

Why Eddings refused help or even some instant replay is beyond me. Everybody in the whole ballpark besides him saw it clear the fence....:(

Top Plays | BAL@TEX: Umps choose not to review Hamilton's double - Video | texasrangers.com: Multimedia

SanDiegoSteve Sat May 22, 2010 01:05am

Well, I'm sure that the Rangers had many other opportunities to overcome any bad calls from the umpires.

I mean, it's not like a one-game playoff with the winning run missing the plate and never touching it ever, and being called safe by one of the supposed best umpires in baseball!:rolleyes:

jicecone Sat May 22, 2010 08:11am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Tyler (Post 677081)
I saw this one in an A's/Rangers game last week.

Did "Balk A Day" get it wrong, or am I missing something here?

You missed something.

Thats why "Balk A Day" is doing the Bigs and "Rush to Judgement" is watching the game.

Steven Tyler Sat May 22, 2010 09:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by jicecone (Post 678005)
You missed something.

Thats why "Balk A Day" is doing the Bigs and "Rush to Judgement" is watching the game.

Thanks for the advice, "Grumpy the Umpire Slayer".


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1