The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 08:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Agreed, but under FED (according to T), the runner is presumed to have interfered with the throw if the runner is (approximately) in a line between F2 and F3
That's how I understand the "clarification" in the FED interps. It's the "any throw if the B/R is out of the lane" concept I have a problem with.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 12:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
To the rediculous side

So a running lane violation is not limited to throws from the HP area.

A throw from F2 ten feet over F3's head with B/R out of the lane is interference because the quality of the throw is not a criteria for RLV.

Then when F4 (in normal position) throws ten feet over F3's head with B/R out of the lane, we have interference for the same reason.

I know it sounds rediculous, but where is the distinction.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
This is what I got on Saturday

I still need clarification if I outstepped my bounds or not. Truly it entailing if we are talking about the F3 - F2 throw or if it can be any throw.

This was Freshman ball so I tend to think I used this as a learning lesson on the field and now my continual learning off the field.

The ball is hit to F5 who charge slightly and make a ok throw to first base. First has to move towards home to make the catch but does have to move off first base to make the play. As he is stretching, this entire body is in fair territory, he nevers reaches back into the running lane.

BR never enters the RL and arrives at the first baseman at approximately the same time as the ball. A nice size (non-mailicious) collision occurs.

There is no interpretation needed whether or not he was on the line or not as he was a good 8"-12" inside fair territory and never established himself in the running lane. Anyhow, I got the out and a very mild *** chewing as the coach was more interesting with arguing "when was he player was suppose to crossover to hit the bag and should we get a dual bag at 1st like softball.

Anyhow, I am hearing some would not call it because it was a F5-F3 throw. I am seeking clarification on that aspect. However, my question/ point/ example should also show that this a safety issue that we can avoid going forward if we mandate them getting in the RL on any throw provided the fielder maintains position on the fair side and does not go back into the RL.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 15, 2010, 04:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
I believe the throw must come from behind the B/R (HP area).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Batter Hit By Throw while running out of three foot zone. LeeBallanfant Baseball 27 Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:22pm
Three-foot running lane question. kfo9494 Softball 4 Wed Jan 21, 2009 05:12pm
ASA 3-foot running lane SRW Softball 9 Tue Feb 19, 2008 04:38pm
3 foot lane benbret Softball 17 Thu Apr 06, 2006 01:25pm
Three Foot Running Lane batterup Baseball 5 Wed Jun 06, 2001 10:06am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1