The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Little League Balk (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/55322-little-league-balk.html)

victory Sat Nov 07, 2009 04:46pm

Little League Balk
 
Hello,
I'm looking at LL RB 7.07 in which during a squeeze attempt and the catcher moves in front of or on the plate or contacts the batter or bat. The umpire is supposed to rule a balk on the pitcher and award first to the batter on the interference. Why not just call interference and give home and first due to that? Why the balk call - is that simply to justify the award of home?

bob jenkins Sat Nov 07, 2009 06:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by victory (Post 634986)
Hello,
I'm looking at LL RB 7.07 in which during a squeeze attempt and the catcher moves in front of or on the plate or contacts the batter or bat. The umpire is supposed to rule a balk on the pitcher and award first to the batter on the interference. Why not just call interference and give home and first due to that? Why the balk call - is that simply to justify the award of home?

What if there's a runner on second (with no runner on first) who isn't advancing on the squeeze play?

UmpJM Sat Nov 07, 2009 06:20pm

victory,

It's adopted from the OBR (aka MLB) rules, on which LL rules are based. It's a "double penalty" because the OBR rule makers wanted to REALLY discourage this particular infraction.

Since, during a true "squeeze play", the R3 is attempting to advance "on the pitch", he would score on the catcher's interference whether a balk was part of the penalty or not.

The only time the 7.07 balk provision makes any difference at all is when there is a squeeze play with an R3 & R2 only, AND the R2 is not attempting to advance on the play. Otherwise, the catcher's interference penalty will produce the same result.

JM

victory Sat Nov 07, 2009 07:23pm

Thanks. But is this pitcher (really catcher interference) balk in any other rule book or just little league? I don't think anyone would argue awarding bases on catcher interference but I can just hear the screaming when you call a balk on the pitcher in this case.

I was watching one of those Jim Evans You Make The Call videos and there was this exact case described and the multiple choice videos had balk or interference. The answer was interference.

The rule makes no mention of a R2 only a R3. Why would the rule maker want to award R2 a base since you are really just trying to plug via rule any easy way for the defense to block a squeeze.

Rich Ives Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by victory (Post 634997)
Thanks. But is this pitcher (really catcher interference) balk in any other rule book or just little league?

LL 7.07: If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or the bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first on the interference and the ball is dead.

OBR 7.07: If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead.

NCAA 8-3-p: If, on an attempted squeeze play or steal of home plate, the catcher steps on or in front of home plate without possession of the ball or touches the batter or the bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk and the catcher with interference.
PENALTY—The ball becomes dead, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference, the run scores and all other runners advance one base.

victory Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:49pm

Thanks Rich that about sums it up I guess.

SanDiegoSteve Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:46am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 635008)
OBR 7.07: If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead.

This served as a great refresher course for me as it came in handy in my game yesterday. With 1 out and a 3/2 count, R3 tried to steal home as the pitcher went into his windup. the pitcher was alerted to the theft, sped up his delivery slightly, delivered strike 3 called as the catcher came out of his crouch, caught the pitch, and then easily tagged out a standing R3 for the 3rd out.

The defense wanted to argue interference, to which I stated, "No, he didn't step on or in front of home plate without the ball, or touch the batter, so no interference." End of argument, end of inning.

I'm glad I had this fresh in my mind and made me sound like I knew what I was talking about!:cool:

RPatrino Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:31pm

It's always nice to sound like we know what we are talking about!! That is really what this forum is about, to keep things on the top of the bubbling cesspool of thoughts that is my brain!!

justanotherblue Mon Nov 09, 2009 01:30pm

Squeeze play in LL? Really? I don't do LL however, I'm under the impression that in LL, the runner can not leave the base until the ball is passed the batter. Therefore, how can you have a squeeze play?

RPatrino Mon Nov 09, 2009 01:51pm

The fact that runner's can't lead off doesn't change the fact that you can still have a squeeze. The runner leaves when the ball crosses the plate, or when the batter contacts the ball. Runners still steal bases and all that stuff in LL, too.

nopachunts Mon Nov 09, 2009 03:27pm

Little League Balk
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by justanotherblue (Post 635221)
Squeeze play in LL? Really? I don't do LL however, I'm under the impression that in LL, the runner can not leave the base until the ball is passed the batter. Therefore, how can you have a squeeze play?

Little League refers to Little League's Major League, usually 11 and 12 year olds. Played on 60' tight bases. Minors which is usually 9 and 10 year olds is also played on 60' tight bases and continous batting order.

The Junior, Senior, and Big League divisions of Little League is played on 90' loose bases and is more like HS ball but with some different rules. A lot of times the LL rules are more confusing that FED rules.

RPatrino Mon Nov 09, 2009 03:59pm

Whats the distinction between 'tight' and 'loose' bases?

SanDiegoSteve Mon Nov 09, 2009 04:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino (Post 635274)
Whats the distinction between 'tight' and 'loose' bases?

I was wondering that as well and then it dawned on me that "tight" refers to no lead offs and "loose" refers to lead offs allowed.

SanDiegoSteve Mon Nov 09, 2009 04:08pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by nopachunts (Post 635266)
A lot of times the LL rules are more confusing that FED rules.

The only rules in the world more confusing than FED rules are the NCAA ones.

nopachunts Mon Nov 09, 2009 04:24pm

Little League Rules
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 635279)
The only rules in the world more confusing than FED rules are the NCAA ones.

Some prime examples:
Based loaded, infield hit or bunt, any runner leaves early, R3 put in dugout, no out or run?
Special pinch runner

Adam Mon Nov 09, 2009 05:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justanotherblue (Post 635221)
Squeeze play in LL? Really? I don't do LL however, I'm under the impression that in LL, the runner can not leave the base until the ball is passed the batter. Therefore, how can you have a squeeze play?

Can't do a suicide squeeze, but you could still run a squeeze play.

SanDiegoSteve Mon Nov 09, 2009 05:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justanotherblue
Squeeze play in LL? Really? I don't do LL however, I'm under the impression that in LL, the runner can not leave the base until the ball is passed the batter. Therefore, how can you have a squeeze play?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 635303)
Can't do a suicide squeeze, but you could still run a squeeze play.

Yes, it's called a "safety squeeze."

Rich Ives Mon Nov 09, 2009 06:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justanotherblue (Post 635221)
Squeeze play in LL? Really? I don't do LL however, I'm under the impression that in LL, the runner can not leave the base until the ball is passed the batter. Therefore, how can you have a squeeze play?

The LL book says 7.07 only applies to the Junior, Senior, and Big Leagues.

aceholleran Tue Nov 24, 2009 04:19am

Quote:

Originally Posted by nopachunts (Post 635283)
Some prime examples:
Based loaded, infield hit or bunt, any runner leaves early, R3 put in dugout, no out or run?
Special pinch runner

Correct. It's the "evaporation" rule. I have never seen it. Some friends of mine have.

LL asks that on such a play, umps must adjudicate what is the "clean hit" by B1. If the rock doesn't leave the infield and no outs are recorded, R3 "vanishes."

MrUmpire Tue Nov 24, 2009 01:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceholleran (Post 637895)
Correct. It's the "evaporation" rule. I have never seen it. Some friends of mine have.

LL asks that on such a play, umps must adjudicate what is the "clean hit" by B1. If the rock doesn't leave the infield and no outs are recorded, R3 "vanishes."

LL umpires around here call it the "poof" rule, as it "poof....he disappeared."

bsaucer Mon Dec 28, 2009 03:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by victory (Post 634986)
Hello,
I'm looking at LL RB 7.07 in which during a squeeze attempt and the catcher moves in front of or on the plate or contacts the batter or bat. The umpire is supposed to rule a balk on the pitcher and award first to the batter on the interference. Why not just call interference and give home and first due to that? Why the balk call - is that simply to justify the award of home?

What started out as a pitching motion ended up as a throw to the plate... Balk! They'll call a balk if the catcher leaves the box before the ball leaves the pitcher's hand.

Ump153 Mon Dec 28, 2009 04:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsaucer (Post 646478)
What started out as a pitching motion ended up as a throw to the plate... Balk! They'll call a balk if the catcher leaves the box before the ball leaves the pitcher's hand.

As long as the pitcher continued to a make legal pitching delivery, it is still a pitch and not a throw.

A pitcher may disengage and throw to home.

Rich Ives Mon Dec 28, 2009 04:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsaucer (Post 646478)
What started out as a pitching motion ended up as a throw to the plate... Balk! They'll call a balk if the catcher leaves the box before the ball leaves the pitcher's hand.

What started out as a pitching motion ended up as a throw to the plate... Balk!

Nope. It's still a pitch.

They'll call a balk if the catcher leaves the box before the ball leaves the pitcher's hand

The interpretation in use is that the catcher cannot move from the box until the time of the pitch - which is when the motion commits the pitcher to pitch.

dash_riprock Mon Dec 28, 2009 06:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsaucer (Post 646478)
They'll call a balk if the catcher leaves the box before the ball leaves the pitcher's hand.

That's the rule (on an IBB), but I've never seen it called and I hope I never do.

DG Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 635313)
Yes, it's called a "safety squeeze."

I'm just wondering how a catcher would know a safety squeeze is on if R3 does not leave the base until the ball reaches the plate (Normal LL), or, why he would see a need to step in front of the plate.

I called a walk off balk in Fall ball, with R2 and R3 and 1 out, when the catcher stepped out of the box by at least 6 feet, before the pitcher even started his motion, but he started as soon as catcher was in place out of the box. At every plate meeting the coaches talked about balks (I did not bring it up), they wanted us to call balks so the kids can learn during Fall ball, no warnings.

Forest Ump Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 646549)
I called a walk off balk in Fall ball, with R2 and R3 and 1 out, when the catcher stepped out of the box by at least 6 feet, before the pitcher even started his motion, but he started as soon as catcher was in place out of the box.

DG....no balk here. It can only be called if it's an IBB. Without the IBB, I would not let the pitcher pitch until the catcher set up correctly. I have never had this happen, but this is how I would handle it.

Rich Ives Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:43pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forest Ump (Post 646622)
DG....no balk here. It can only be called if it's an IBB. Without the IBB, I would not let the pitcher pitch until the catcher set up correctly. I have never had this happen, but this is how I would handle it.

Given the game situation I'd bet a lot that it was an IBB.

Forest Ump Tue Dec 29, 2009 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Ives (Post 646623)
Given the game situation I'd bet a lot that it was an IBB.

Opps....After reading it again, I wouldn't take that bet. :o

Ump153 Tue Dec 29, 2009 02:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG (Post 646549)

I called a walk off balk in Fall ball, with R2 and R3 and 1 out, when the catcher stepped out of the box by at least 6 feet, before the pitcher even started his motion, but he started as soon as catcher was in place out of the box. At every plate meeting the coaches talked about balks (I did not bring it up), they wanted us to call balks so the kids can learn during Fall ball, no warnings.

When coaches say that, usually they are looking for reinforcement of what they've been warning their pitchers about. I doubt "the lesson" you taught them was on their radar.

DG Tue Dec 29, 2009 02:40pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ump153 (Post 646646)
When coaches say that, usually they are looking for reinforcement of what they've been warning their pitchers about. I doubt "the lesson" you taught them was on their radar.

I am pretty sure that one was not on their radar. I overhead the manager telling the league commissioner after the game that a game should not end that way, and I agree, properly instructed catcher will not do that, and if a pitcher saw him step out he should have stepped off and called for a meeting instead of starting his motion. I doubt there was any player or coach in the league who did not hear about it, so I don't expect it will happen in the Spring.

justanotherblue Wed Dec 30, 2009 02:11pm

That's because most who coach at that level don't know the rule's well at all. Believing that a balk is caused from illegal action by the pitcher only.

Rich Ives Wed Dec 30, 2009 02:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by justanotherblue (Post 646971)
That's because most who coach at that level don't know the rule's well at all. Believing that a balk is caused from illegal action by the pitcher only.

On an IBB it IS an illegal action by the pitcher - at least in OBR.

8.05 If there is a runner, or runners, it is a balk when—

(l) The pitcher, while giving an intentional base on balls, pitches when the catcher is not in the catcher’s box;


The catcher created a situation where the pitcher could balk, but it is the pitcher that continued with the IBB and actually balked.

There IS one action by the catcher that is beyond the pitcher's control and results in a balk call - see 7.07.

justanotherblue Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:53pm

Yes, the pitcher gets dinged for both not knowing the rule and having a catcher and quite possibly a coach that also doesn't know the rule and teaches this. I'll try in the future to make myself clearer for those anal retentative in the forum.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1