"First of all I have to ask, do you continue to stay in the courtroom and try and covince the jury your are right after they have ruled against you?"
Somehow, I just can't believe that you STILL don't agree.:confused: |
Gotcha!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
No slight-of-hand magic here. I made myself clear in post #1. Wendelstedt and Roder's ruling were available long ago. Does it answer OP in original thread? I'll never know because it was deleted. All along, I thought GA Umpire was relying on previous experience and knowledge How does WR compare to OP, to Roder? Nor do I wish to tell-it-all-by-myself-all-over-again. I see members of the discussion have been influenced by previous blind-test results. Funny how I managed to slip in Roder's opinion, prior to Wendies. To answer your question. Interference. Why? See Roder. Let me know when valid blind-test results from Roder's decision are back. Read your interp from start to finish, especially the part underneath your BOLD emphasis. See Roder, Pg 115-116. "Interference by an Offensive Teammate" Read VI, VI(b), VI(1), VI(2), Penalty (a), Note ruling for interference without a play, and Ex 1. |
You are simply still wrong. The ruling was given in a timely fashion. You asked for an authoritive opinion, Josh emailed the Wendelstedts, they replied, GA Umpire posted the results. Game, Set, Match to us. You lose. Go home. Game Over.
|
Quote:
|
The Evidence?
Quote:
3rd party provided Roder info which suggests otherwise. Have you even considered the Roder document? Please do tell. JEA - if an overthrow should touch a coach, the umpire should determine if the coach used his best efforts to avoid the overthrow and/or fielder or whether his actions were palpably designed to interfere. See Tee may concur with your assessment, but based on previous "ridiculous" statements and omissions of fact, previous actions speak for themselves. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Asked directly to SAump:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
GA gives you the e-mail that was sent to me from Wendelstedt and yet you still want to be....ummm forum decorum policy and personal morals prevents me for completing that sentence. Quote:
-Josh |
Quote:
Look at their site if you want but it has only been there just over 24 hours from now. |
Evidence is Weak
Quote:
You really want me to believe this interp as baseball gospel? His interpretation supports a 1stBC in his coaching box at TOI on IF throw. See JEA and 3.15. Hardly supports action of non-participant, or throw from the OF to HP. Rule calls for no interference on throw from OF through ODC. Gee, can't we agree to disagree and you GO AWAY! Other people who know what they are talking about may wish to say something logical. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27am. |