The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 17, 2009, 08:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 62
This happened in the Mets/Orioles game last night. The ball was originally ruled a foul ball, and as the training staff attended to Melvin Mora's hand (ball hit it) the umpires conferred and changed it to a strike three. Mora argued and could be seen pointing to the bat, like it hit both the bat and his hand. But I could not imagine a scenario where it would hit the bat FIRST then his hand. It would have had to be the other way around, and so the changed call was correct. I also can't imagine a simultaneous hit of hand/bat, since the hand is on the bat, not even with it.

Am I right? If the ball hits the hand AND the bat, it has to hit the hand first, right?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not only are the hands part of the bat . . . greymule Softball 10 Thu Aug 17, 2006 06:35pm
Hands are part of the bat?? NSABlue Softball 12 Mon Jun 06, 2005 01:51pm
Hands part of the bat, page 5... JEL Softball 2 Tue May 24, 2005 10:05am
Hands not part of the bat Chess Ref Softball 7 Fri Apr 08, 2005 09:51am
Hands part of bat FLORIDA UMP Baseball 13 Sun Apr 21, 2002 08:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1