The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 10:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by rpumpire View Post
I love that MA uses OBR-based rules.

I'm ambivalent on the handshake. They don't require us to be within a "step and a reach" of the handshake line, just on-the-field.
No malice meant about not using FED rules, we just don't want the newbies to go running to the FED rulebook on this.

What does MA want you guys on the field for, anyway? Are you supposed to break up a confrontation or take names? (maybe we should start a new thread)
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 08:44pm
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
No intent to injure, just a bit of carelessness on the part of the pitcher. Looked like he tagged him hard to make sure he got the out. Pitcher went away right after the tag, a sign of no aggression.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 23, 2009, 10:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 770
What are you guys seeing that I'm not. I see the BR running outside the foul line, and seeing that he is a dead duck, crossing to fair territory to crash the fielder. The fielder saw it coming and protected the tag and himself. If anything, it was offensive malicious contact in FED. Would not you think if he was facing a tag the BR would avoid to the foulside or maybe backpedal (no they are not that smart enough). I won't be signing up on utube to voice my opinion however.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 24, 2009, 11:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
I hate the fact that FED baseball has gone somewhat overboard with the wussy protection rules, but for Chrissakes, a two-arm pop in the chops is malicious contact. I had an identical tag play last week, and the pitcher tagged the runner a little roughly in the pit of the stomach and the kid went down in a heap, which we later learned was due to a previous rib injury. But I had nothing other than an out call, even though the runner "looked" injured. The guy had a right to make a quick, sure tag. But not in the face!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 12:04am
I drank what?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 1,085
Send a message via MSN to w_sohl
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Pitcher went away right after the tag, a sign of no aggression.
More like a move hoping he didn't get caught.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 02:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,895
A sign of no aggression. Wow. I missed that.

Forearm in the face has always seemed aggressive to me. Maybe I don't watch enough pro wrestling to know what that kind of playful aggression is and how to distinguish it from real aggression.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 08:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 194
I watched the video once, and my first thought was this play was totally unnecessary and I immediately thought I would eject the pitcher.

I really expected the next part of the video to show the pitcher getting hit in the ribs when he batted the next time.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 03:00pm
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty View Post
A sign of no aggression. Wow. I missed that.

Forearm in the face has always seemed aggressive to me. Maybe I don't watch enough pro wrestling to know what that kind of playful aggression is and how to distinguish it from real aggression.
It was a glove to the helmet. A hard tag yes, but probably done due to not thinking that he didn't need to tag the guy so hard. If the player had meant it in an aggressive way, he would have stayed there. Not many players are going to do something aggressive, then run away to not get caught.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 09:34pm
I drank what?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 1,085
Send a message via MSN to w_sohl
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Not many players are going to do something aggressive, then run away to not get caught.
So you conceed that some players, like the one in the video, would try to move away, as he did in the video, to avoid being caught?

I don't care what the players intentions were, my preventative officiating is ejecting the kid for malicious contact.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 26, 2009, 09:53am
cc6 cc6 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by w_sohl View Post
So you conceed that some players, like the one in the video, would try to move away, as he did in the video, to avoid being caught?

I don't care what the players intentions were, my preventative officiating is ejecting the kid for malicious contact.
No the opposite. If a player does something aggressive he is going to stay there and hold his ground.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 11:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Not many players are going to do something aggressive, then run away to not get caught.

Far more players are going to attempt to avoid getting caught than those will stand there in an agressive stance in front of the umpire and others.`
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Apr 25, 2009, 10:36pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by cc6 View Post
Pitcher went away right after the tag, a sign of no aggression.
Oh, you mean no further sign of aggression.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ouch!!!! IRISHMAFIA Softball 7 Mon Apr 28, 2008 03:58pm
Ouch! tiger49 Baseball 2 Mon Jul 03, 2006 01:10am
Ouch! Just Curious Softball 8 Sun May 01, 2005 12:11am
OUCH SoGARef Football 5 Wed Sep 29, 2004 11:08pm
Ouch! Andy Softball 12 Tue Apr 08, 2003 01:23pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1