The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 20, 2002, 10:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1
Question

I recently had an interesting scenario present itself. Runners on first and third with one out. The batter hits a ground ball to the shortstop, and the runner on third breaks for home. The runner on third is caught in a rundown, in which a collision occurs as he is retreating to third base while the third baseman had possession of the ball. The base umpire ejected both the third baseman and the runner for raising their elbows during the collision. In the meantime, the runner from third is now between second and third, and the batter/runner is standing on second. The third baseman then throws the ball to the second baseman, who promptly tags out the runner between second and third.

The ruling on the field was that the ball was dead immediately after the two players were ejected, and that all other runners must go back to the bases they last safely occupied. I later looked this up in the rulebook, but could find no mention of it. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 20, 2002, 11:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
The ruling was wrong. Ejections do not take effect until no further play is possible.

9.01 (d) Each umpire has authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager or substitute for objecting to decisions or for unsportsmanlike conduct or language, and to eject such disqualified person from the playing field. If an umpire disqualifies a player while a play is in progress, the disqualification shall not take effect until no further action is possible in that play.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 21, 2002, 07:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally posted by mattwick
I recently had an interesting scenario present itself. Runners on first and third with one out. The batter hits a ground ball to the shortstop, and the runner on third breaks for home. The runner on third is caught in a rundown, in which a collision occurs as he is retreating to third base while the third baseman had possession of the ball. The base umpire ejected both the third baseman and the runner for raising their elbows during the collision. In the meantime, the runner from third is now between second and third, and the batter/runner is standing on second. The third baseman then throws the ball to the second baseman, who promptly tags out the runner between second and third.

The ruling on the field was that the ball was dead immediately after the two players were ejected, and that all other runners must go back to the bases they last safely occupied. I later looked this up in the rulebook, but could find no mention of it. What do you think?
The ball does not become dead until the umpire calls time at the end of all continuing action, at which time the ejections take affect.

JEA puts one scenario this way:

Situation: Runner on second. One out. Batter smashes a line drive into center field... the runner heads home and is called "Safe" on a close play. The catcher argues violently and is ejected from the game. Meanwhile, the batter-runner is advancing to second... the catcher fires to second for the putout. Does this out stand since the catcher had been ejected before the play?

RULING: The out stands. The ejection does not take effect until no further action is possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 21, 2002, 08:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Originally posted by mattwick

I recently had an interesting scenario present itself. Runners on first and third with one out. The batter hits a ground ball to the shortstop, and the runner on third breaks for home. The runner on third is caught in a rundown, in which a collision occurs as he is retreating to third base while the third baseman had possession of the ball. The base umpire ejected both the third baseman and the runner for raising their elbows during the collision. In the meantime, the runner from third is now between second and third, and the batter/runner is standing on second. The third baseman then throws the ball to the second baseman, who promptly tags out the runner between second and third.

The ruling on the field was that the ball was dead immediately after the two players were ejected, and that all other runners must go back to the bases they last safely occupied. I later looked this up in the rulebook, but could find no mention of it. What do you think?


Im most cases TIME should not be called but allow play to continue and eject AFTER play ends. EXCEPT:

If a fight breaks out, I would call TIME. You see this even in the PROS. F1 pitches one inside and B1 takes offense to this and then all of a sudden, B1 charges F1. You see the PU call TIME immediately.

With the exception of an actual fight on the field, allow play to continue, then eject the offenders.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 21, 2002, 10:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
The ruling was wrong. Ejections do not take effect until no further play is possible.

9.01 (d) Each umpire has authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager or substitute for objecting to decisions or for unsportsmanlike conduct or language, and to eject such disqualified person from the playing field. If an umpire disqualifies a player while a play is in progress, the disqualification shall not take effect until no further action is possible in that play.
Agreed for straight OBR, but if a malicious contact rule was added, then you need to know the basis of the rule for the league.

In FED, malicious contact is an immediate dead ball.
As described, this may have been ruled malicious contact, and the possibility exists a dead ball call may have been correct.

Check your league rules.


Just my opinion,

Freix

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 21, 2002, 10:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Steve,

What's the awards on an immediate dead ball for malicious contact?

Bases loaded, defense up by two, batter hits a gapper, F3 tackles him as he approaches 1B. Only one runner has scored at the time. What do you rule?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 21, 2002, 11:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
Steve,

What's the awards on an immediate dead ball for malicious contact?

Bases loaded, defense up by two, batter hits a gapper, F3 tackles him as he approaches 1B. Only one runner has scored at the time. What do you rule?
That's also obstruction -- award bases to nullify the penalty. In the specific play, 3 runs score, even if R1 would normally lose a race with a snail.

Malicious contact by the offense is (in FED) an immediate dead ball -- runners return.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1