The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Not even (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/49629-not-even.html)

justanotherblue Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:13am

Not even
 
An hour and it's locked... that's faster than ringing up the batter on strike one:D

SanDiegoSteve Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:14am

Now, now...let's not pile on :)

Tim C Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:20am

~Sigh~
 
I apologize to all of you that took time to react to the OP and then lost that material by heavy handed moderation.

We now know that we really can't criticize anyone "they" know.

As PapaC says: "Lah me."

Regards and I apologize one final time.

Regards,

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:36am

My posts were deleted for absolutely no reason before Tim C's thread was locked. No reason, other than my agreeing with Tim and telling the truth. There are Cardinal Rules about running a message board and they don't seem to know them here. Maybe you guys should change the way you operate?? Anyone else disgusted with the arbitrary censorship??

I sent this message to this moderator:

Why did you delete my posts before you locked that thread? And why did you lock the thread?

That is irresponsible and biased and very cowardly. The truth is a part of life that you obviously have a tough time with handling. And you're supposed to be an official.

What's going on? What rule did I violate? You must be joking ...

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C (Post 547166)
I apologize to all of you that took time to react to the OP and then lost that material by heavy handed moderation.

We now know that we really can't criticize anyone "they" know.

As PapaC says: "Lah me."

Regards and I apologize one final time.

Regards,

Hey, be yourself and no need to apologize! You are an important and respectable voice in umpiring and I/we have learned a lot from you. I read your posts for a long time before I started posting, and you're a little brash, but you can back it up without much effort at all.

Stay at it!

justanotherblue Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:53am

It's easy to tell when one reads through the posts, the level of play one works, and or experience, overall knowledge as well as ones ability to comprehend the intent of the written word. From the outside looking in, I find myself siding with SDS, Tim, Ozzy and Bobby more than not. I'm slow to jump on a fellow umpire as we all make mistakes. Unfortunately when the mistakes are there for all to see and against all mechanics that are taught, it's tough not to. The plays missed were pure mechanic failures...moving, not set...timing issues, (even the locked one) angle/distance, those things we're taught while growing up and beat into us as young umpires, struggling to learn the two man system. In six man mechanics they shouldn't happen, they do. Obviously, this year there were plenty throughout the playoffs. Terrible calls are terrible calls, and as an officiating forum there will be discussion on them. :cool:

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:25pm

Precisely!

And it seldom leaves those confines. Simple criticisms of umpiring just disappear from here. No rules or standards broken, just deleted.

bob jenkins Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:41pm

One moderators take on this:

1) I agree that I would not have deleted many of the posts in the closed thread that Tim C started. That said, I know I didn't see them all.

2) Just like when we're on the field, comments about officiating (the calls) are generally acceptable; comments about the officials (personal) are not.

3) As one example, Kevin's "letter to the moderator" posted in this thread contains a personal attack (something like, "The truth about this is something you can't handle and you're supposed to be an official."). That's something that would normally be deleted. The questions he asks ("Why were my posts deleted?") are valid (I've been asked that before, and responded with my reasoning to the requestor.)

4) If I'm "in a good mood" I'll edit the post; if not, I'll just delete it all. The latter happens more often than the former.

5) My opinion of SDS' posts (since that's what seemed to precipitate this latest discussion) on Ed H (as I recall them -- but my memory isn't what they used to be): The were pure "fan-boyish" (I recall the trite "he cost us the game" BS) and didn't help anyone become a better official, especially on a baseball forum (I'm led to believe that there were posts on the football forum, but I didn't read any of those). I don't recall them being too personal, though.

6) In some discussions the moderators had about the thread, I discovered that the other moderator is "going through a rough patch." He apologized (both publically and privately) and even though it doesn't get the posts back, I'm inclined to cut him a break.

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 01:04pm

That was something that I wrote in a message (which was very true) and then later decided to make public, because it is related to a public issue. I said the truth--the plain truth--in my posts and they were summarily deleted for no reason and only then was the thread locked.

Come on. Locking it is one thing, but hand picking a few posts and deleting them before you lock it is really a violation of how these things are supposed to operate. I'm no youngster.

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 01:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 547216)
One moderators take on this:
6) In some discussions the moderators had about the thread, I discovered that the other moderator is "going through a rough patch." He apologized (both publically and privately) and even though it doesn't get the posts back, I'm inclined to cut him a break.

I am a sympathetic person, but this is a poor excuse for deleting my posts and others' posts this morning. You need to take more control, perhaps.

mick Thu Oct 30, 2008 01:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 547230)
I am a sympathetic person, but this is a poor excuse for deleting my posts and others' posts this morning. You need to take more control, perhaps.

Kevin,
Nobody disagrees with you.
The apology was made.
The posts are gone.
Please allow this subject to rest in peace.
Thanks.
mick

PeteBooth Thu Oct 30, 2008 01:58pm

Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim C (Post 547166)
I apologize to all of you that took time to react to the OP and then lost that material by heavy handed moderation.

We now know that we really can't criticize anyone "they" know.

As PapaC says: "Lah me."

Regards and I apologize one final time.

Regards,


Hi Tee:

IMO, I think the umpire Forums are in a way afraid that their site will turn into Gary McGriff's 2.

As you are well aware, McGriff's was one if not thee best umpire discussion Forum around. Many a knowledgeable umpire posted there religiously. The likes of Papa C, Bob Pariseau, Jim Porter, George Lucy (GEE), Warren Wilson Dave Hensley, just to name a few.

You could say anything you wanted at that site.

McGriff's then tuned into the Jerry Springer umpire discussion Forum and I think (not certain) the site is not up anymore.

Therefore, I agree with your position about the moderators knowing certain individuals and taking exception when someone says something negative about them. I also think what happened over at McGriff's has had an impact on what posts get deleted as well.

Pete Booth

PS2Man Thu Oct 30, 2008 02:25pm

I am a little concerned
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PeteBooth (Post 547278)
Hi Tee:

IMO, I think the umpire Forums are in a way afraid that their site will turn into Gary McGriff's 2.

That may be a valid concern, but I am not seeing a lot of consistency on this site lately. This conversation was not much different than a conversation on the football board several weeks ago and that was not deleted. There were a couple of threads on the basketball side that were closed and in one of them all that took place were a disagreement over a philosophy. I read this board and people get personal and nothing is done. It seems like there is not set standard of what is wrong and what is allowed. I do not post here very often but I read this place from time to time. It also seems like we are losing a lot of people that used to frequent the board because of many of these issues. At some point this place is not going to be worth the trouble. Garth left several months ago and a lot of this was based on things the moderators could have solved. Maybe I should stay away as well. In officiating we are looking for some level of consistency and right now we are not getting it from the people that run the board.

SanDiegoSteve Thu Oct 30, 2008 03:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 547216)

5) My opinion of SDS' posts (since that's what seemed to precipitate this latest discussion) on Ed H (as I recall them -- but my memory isn't what they used to be): The were pure "fan-boyish" (I recall the trite "he cost us the game" BS) and didn't help anyone become a better official, especially on a baseball forum (I'm led to believe that there were posts on the football forum, but I didn't read any of those). I don't recall them being too personal, though.

I said that he cost the Chargers the game, not "us." I don't play for the Chargers. Also, this was on the football board (not the baseball board), and the posts followed many others who felt that the call was wrong. I guess because I do follow the Chargers, and I'm from San Diego, and another Charger fan was getting shellacked at the same time, that my comments came off as "fanboyish." Well, on Sunday's, my officials hat comes off (seeing as though I am retired), and my Lightning Bolts get strapped on. My comments were made in the heat of the moment, while still seething from the events of the game.

I had all but forgotten the whole thing, when some lame poster decided it was a good idea to remind me about my little tirade weeks later on the baseball board. He felt it necessary to rehash the whole thing, and I merely stood up for my post and defended my actions. The subject of Ed H. would never have made it to the baseball side of the forum except for this individual's insistence on dragging out the already dead horse and beating on it some more.

It is true that his call did cost them the game, as without the call the
Chargers would have simply ran out the clock, but I never insulted Ed H. on a personal level. I did not impune his integrity, malign him or his family, call him any names, talk about his mama, etc. I did not accuse him of intentionally blowing the call. I merely expressed myself about the call being quite horrible, which is undeniable.

Nothing at all like the beating I take quite often from certain individuals on this forum.:)

mick Thu Oct 30, 2008 03:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PS2Man (Post 547299)
That may be a valid concern, but I am not seeing a lot of consistency on this site lately. This conversation was not much different than a conversation on the football board several weeks ago and that was not deleted.

PS2MAN,
Each forum has a different personality.
Thus, each will be moderated differently.

Apparently, face guarding is also called differently.

Raymond Thu Oct 30, 2008 03:54pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 547329)
I had all but forgotten the whole thing, when some lame poster decided it was a good idea to remind me about my little tirade weeks later on the baseball board. He felt it necessary to rehash the whole thing, and I merely stood up for my post and defended my actions.

Is this vvvv
Quote:

Originally Posted by lame poster
Yeah, with some inane post about Ed Hochuli on the football boards.

what you "call rehashing the whole thing"? Me thinks someone has a problem with hyperbole.



Now, below would be the "inane post" referenced above and some lame poster's response to that "inane post". I really love the reference to ESPN sportcasters and how the ball slipping out of Cutler's hand is somehow a great play by the SD defense. :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 537448)
Well, everyone is piling on the Chargers fan here. I never said Hochuli wasn't human, I just said he cost the Chargers the game. Which he did. It wasn't the Chargers porous defense or any other "if" scenarios posted. The Chargers recovered what should have been a fumble. They shouldn't have been put in the situation to let Cutler get another chance to score and then go for two. That should have never occurred. What led up to the score being what it was is irrelevant. The call cost them the ball, and cost them the game because they would have easily ran out the clock. Game over.

And I'm not just some fan, I've refereed football and basketball in addition to all the baseball I've umpired. I've never made a call that horrible in my life in any sport, so stop trying to defend Hochuli as "being human." He's a human that cost the Chargers the game, and I'm not the only one who thinks so. Every sportscaster on ESPN seem to agree. What the defense did or didn't do earlier in the game all came down to a great play by the defense being overturned by a BAD CALL. Does San Diego need to improve on defense? Of course they do, but it isn't the reason they lost this one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 537550)
I peruse the Baseball forum. Anytime anyone blames an umpire for a loss or for costing his team a run that person gets ripped. Guess it's just a different standard for other sports, right? :rolleyes:


mick Thu Oct 30, 2008 04:04pm

Play nicely. :)

SanDiegoSteve Thu Oct 30, 2008 04:05pm

See what I mean. Just can't quit beating the dead horse. That post belongs over on the football boards, so why are you bringing it back to life over here?

The great play by the Chargers was the recovery of the fumble, errrrrr...incomplete pass. And not only the ESPN sportscasters, but Jim Rome, Dan Patrick, J.T. The Brick, every local, state and national talk show host, plus every rational human being on the planet familiar with the play said the call cost the Chargers the game. Face it, it did.

NOW GET OFF MY A$S!

P.S. Notice how I didn't say "us" or "we?" I don't play for the Chargers.

BigUmp56 Thu Oct 30, 2008 05:50pm

So................
 
Why can't we in an attempt to be sure we don't make a similar terrible call, mention someone in the professional ranks by name, without fear of censorship?

Just what is being protected here. Is it the integrity of the forum, or a perceived reputation of a man paid to take a large amount of scrutiny. Doug Eddings poor mechanics were all but crucified here two years ago. It's my opinion that we all benefited from those discussions. I now have to wonder that had Eddings been acquainted with the moderators of this forum whether or not that discussion would have been heavy handed and quashed in the name of forum preservation. This whole thing was handled in the poorest of form!


Tim Haag.

Secretary - North Central Indiana Umpires Association.

SethPDX Thu Oct 30, 2008 06:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 547348)
See what I mean. Just can't quit beating the dead horse. That post belongs over on the football boards, so why are you bringing it back to life over here?

Exactly. I remember the original discussion over the Hochuli call. I found the reference to a post about that several weeks later in a baseball thread to be totally unnecessary. That is, unless people have yet to get beyond what was said back then...

kylejt Thu Oct 30, 2008 07:10pm

Hey, I'll raise my hand here.

If I recall correctly, I used the term "Hochulied" to describe a blown call by a baseball umpire, and thus started this brush fire. Being from San Diego, and a Chargers fan, it was a just a little local humor. So sorry if it twisted anyone's nipples out of joint.

But honestly, y'all need to.....
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...g/sgthulka.jpg

Kevin Finnerty Thu Oct 30, 2008 09:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick (Post 547238)
Kevin,
Nobody disagrees with you.
The apology was made.
The posts are gone.
Please allow this subject to rest in peace.
Thanks.
mick

Uh, sorry, but there is a very broad issue that involves others and not just myself and my posts. Sorry you see things through a narrow lens. Tim C. got taken for a ride and it created an examination of some unfair practices. Excuse making aside.

Nigel Tufnel Thu Oct 30, 2008 09:35pm

Lmao
 
I like to bring a bit of humor when I can when. I finally stopped lurking and joined this forum to mix things up a little. But this is rediculous.

Just like Hacksaw Hamilton's hair...

Oh yeah...Lighten up Francis stands the test of time....CLASSIC

mick Thu Oct 30, 2008 09:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Finnerty (Post 547402)
Uh, sorry, but there is a very broad issue that involves others and not just myself and my posts. Sorry you see things through a narrow lens. Tim C. got taken for a ride and it created an examination of some unfair practices. Excuse making aside.

Yeah, I cannot disagree with you.
I don't get out much.

SethPDX Thu Oct 30, 2008 09:46pm

Well, the posts everyone's talking about got deleted before I got online, so (if we're quoting movies) "I have NO IDEA WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" :D You have to get up pretty early in the morning to read the "good" posts.

And Stripes is one of my favorites. That's just one of the good lines in it.

Nigel Tufnel Thu Oct 30, 2008 09:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SethPDX (Post 547421)
Well, the posts everyone's talking about got deleted before I got online, so (if we're quoting movies) "I have NO IDEA WHAT WE'RE YELLING ABOUT!!!" :D You have to get up pretty early in the morning to read the "good" posts.

And Stripes is one of my favorites. That's just one of the good lines in it.

Take one step back Winger...Move it...

That's why the guys in the auto club call me the Cruiser...

There was one?

You got a 6-8 week training plan..Which is perfect for me..

PS2Man Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick (Post 547332)
PS2MAN,
Each forum has a different personality.
Thus, each will be moderated differently.

Apparently, face guarding is also called differently.

You are probably right. The only issue is the very same person did the closing or deleting of discussions. Maybe he was having a bad day as started earlier.

mick Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by PS2Man (Post 547430)
You are probably right. The only issue is the very same person did the closing or deleting of discussions. Maybe he was having a bad day as started earlier.

It is a trying time, but he'll make it.

Kevin Finnerty Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick (Post 547417)
Yeah, I cannot disagree with you.
I don't get out much.

;) It's all good.

kylejt Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:54am

Why do some folks get so worked up by what others tap out on a keyboard?

Raymond Fri Oct 31, 2008 07:35am

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve (Post 547348)
And not only the ESPN sportscasters, but Jim Rome, Dan Patrick, J.T. The Brick,...

And....Tim McCarver says to count one thousand one.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1