The Official Forum - Runner Question

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)

- Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)

- - Runner Question (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/45605-runner-question.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus

Bob - thanks, this is exactly what I was trying to get at. How, specifically, would a batter "act like a batter" after missing a squeeze bunt, with R3 coming to home, and not interfere with the catcher? Does that mean back out of the way, remain in the box, etc.? If the answer is that it's up to the PU's discretion/judgement as to what is/isn't interference that's fine, but I would like to know what is typically considered to be a non-interference action by the batter.

Please understand my desire here is to better understand the rule in order to instruct players (yes, I'm one of those evil coaches). I'm not going to trot this post thread out during a game (i.e., my intent is to better understand the game and its rules, not get "ammo" for some future argument).

Thanks again for all your comments, they are appreciated.

It is up to the umpire's judgment in the end. After the batter has had an opportunity to offer at the pitch, he has the obligation to vacate the area so he does not interfere. It's really a "had to be there" play.

As a coach, I would just coach all my kids to batter left handed and then you don't have to worry as much about this situation :rolleyes: Maybe I'm of that opinion because I bat left handed.:cool:

In all seriousness, this is a tricky play. The batter has to be aware of the location of the ball at all times and avoid the interference. Staying in the box does not absolve him from interference. If it's a loose ball that parks itself in line with the plate and the batter, it's going to be a tough situation for all parties involved.

There may be an instance when it is not feasible for your batter to move as well. If the pitcher is in the windup, the runner from third takes off at first movement, and he has decent speed, he may be right on top of the plate when the ball arrives. In that case, the batter won't have the opportunity to vacate.

The key is that your batters always know where the ball is and move accordingly (if they have the opportunity/time to vacate).

Just my two cents

-Josh

[QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus

R3 coming home on a squeeze and B1 bunting all happen in a heartbeat.

You cannot expect the batter to simply vanish from the plate area. On a squeeze play after the batter trys to bunt the ball and misses it, the runner for the most part is almost at home plate already so unless the batter does something "extra" it's a difficult call to rule BI.

The bottom line is: Umpire Judgement. That's why they pay us the "big bucks"

Pete Booth

[QUOTE=PeteBooth]

Quote:

The bottom line is: Umpire Judgement. That's why they pay us the "big bucks"

I think you mistakenly added an 's' on the end of your statement. Didn't you mean "big buck" :confused:

-Josh

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrUmpire

I addressed a specific comment in a specific post. That comment regarded intent whie taking action, which is a consideration in neither the rule, nor the MLBUM. Your post, addressing nothing that either the OP posted or anything I posted, is indeed irrelevant.

I know some posters here like to respond to a specific question or statement and then add, "but in a different scenario, here's another answer." I am not one of those. My replies are fairly well focused on the scenarios provided.

Actually MrU, that is what I was implying and apologize if I didn't make myself clear. My statement was meant to say that a batter remaining in the batter's box isn't given carte blanche do anything he wants and still not be guilty of interference. If he displays an intent to interfere while remaining in the box, then I will call it.