The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 03, 2002, 01:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 10
Less than 2 outs, runner on 1st, anything and 2 count on the batter. Runner takes off in an obvious steal attempt. batter swings and misses (or called 3rd strike) but ball obvilusly short hopps the catchers glove. Catcher throws down to 2nd and runner is safe (or out). Is this a dropped third strike? Does the R-1 obviously leaving the base open the door for the batter-runner to take advantage of a dropped third strike?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 03, 2002, 07:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 77
1) Yes, it is an uncaught third strike.

2) No, the "door is not open" for the batter to run. First base was occupied at the time of the pitch. Batter is out.

The result of the play on R1 stands.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 03, 2002, 08:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Originally posted by BlueGhost_Scout

Less than 2 outs, runner on 1st, anything and 2 count on the batter. Runner takes off in an obvious steal attempt. batter swings and misses (or called 3rd strike) but ball obvilusly short hopps the catchers glove. Catcher throws down to 2nd and runner is safe (or out). Is this a dropped third strike? Does the R-1 obviously leaving the base open the door for the batter-runner to take advantage of a dropped third strike?

As Thom mentioned, r1 occupied first at TOP. This is a common question that I get from coaches all the time.

An umpire can help him / herself out on the situation described by signalling and saying B1 is OUT B1 is OUT so that everyone knows.

Ball is live and the only thing we know for certain is that the batter is out. Now in a VERY RARE case, if the umpire judged that B1 was intentionally deceiving the defense by running towards first when he / she KNEW they were out, then one could rule interference, but as mentioned that is a rare case.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1