The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 07:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 77
Contact at Plate - FED

(FED) What guidelines should be used when calling a runner out at home for making contact with the catcher? When should contact be considered incidental? What if the catcher was up the line 2 feet without possession of the ball? What if he drops the ball? Should contact significant enough to knock the catcher over always be called an out even if, in the umpire's judgement, the contact was accidental or unintentional?

I've seen this called so many different ways - obviously, parents and coaches' perceptions of the way it should be called is always different based on whether our team is on offense or defense.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 07:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwbuddy
(FED) What guidelines should be used when calling a runner out at home for making contact with the catcher? When should contact be considered incidental? What if the catcher was up the line 2 feet without possession of the ball? What if he drops the ball? Should contact significant enough to knock the catcher over always be called an out even if, in the umpire's judgement, the contact was accidental or unintentional?

I've seen this called so many different ways - obviously, parents and coaches' perceptions of the way it should be called is always different based on whether our team is on offense or defense.
Guidelines? I suggest following the FED rulebook.

Contact should be considered incidental when it is.

Catcher up the line without possession? Obstruction.

Drops ball? Doesn't matter, obstruction if he was us the line without the ball.

Catcher being knocked over? Sometimes you have trainwrecks. There is contact in baseball.

Basically, sometimes you have to umpire.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 07:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
The reference to "our team" suggests that bwbuddy is not an umpire. His question suggests that he's not familiar with the rules.

bwbuddy: the answer to your question is that by rule, contact anywhere is incidental until it is obstruction, interference, or malicious contact.

To put it another way: there are no guidelines for when contact is incidental, since that's the default. The guidelines are for INT, OBS, MC, etc. If you get a rule book, you will find definitions of all of those terms (see rule 2). The case book will give you rough guidelines.

If you have a specific play in mind, we can offer suggestions about how we might rule, but judging contact is very often a "had to be there" situation.

I think that's what etn was getting at.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwbuddy
(FED) What guidelines should be used when calling a runner out at home for making contact with the catcher? When should contact be considered incidental? What if the catcher was up the line 2 feet without possession of the ball? What if he drops the ball? Should contact significant enough to knock the catcher over always be called an out even if, in the umpire's judgement, the contact was accidental or unintentional?

I've seen this called so many different ways - obviously, parents and coaches' perceptions of the way it should be called is always different based on whether our team is on offense or defense.
In a perfect world, the runner should be heading for the base/plate and the fielder should not be in the "line of fire" unless he has possession of the ball. That said, it rarely happens that way!

Runners playing under FED rules need to always try to get to the base/plate and not the fielder. That right there is the most important factor in how I judge malicious contact. If F2 is near the line without the ball and R3 leaves his line to the plate and purposely drills F2, that is malicious. If F2 is in the line to the plate without the ball, he is putting himself in harm's way and that is a "had to be there". Now if F2 has the ball and drops it, you will probably have a "train wreck" (both players are doing what they are supposed to be doing). The last thing to compound the whole matter is that "the force of the collision should not be used to judge if the contact is malicious" (FED quote). It really is up to the umpire's judgment.

As Umpires, we have a lot of judgment during these plays before we can apply the rules of contact, obstruction and interference. I've had collisions that resulted in cuts, bruises and even a fractured pelvis (and these were train wrecks)!

Now, Moms & Dads see it as some kid just bowled over their son so you will never win with them. As a player (which is what I think you are), you just have to do your best to get to the base/plate in a legal way. At the High School level, you don't want to purposely take out a player as you will be ejected on the spot. It doesn't help your team when that happens either.

Hope this helps.
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 11:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900
Now if F2 has the ball and drops it, you will probably have a "train wreck" (both players are doing what they are supposed to be doing).
In FED, if F2 has the ball, the runner must make a legal attempt (including a slide) to avoid the fielder. The runner's choices are "get down, go around, or give up".
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 12:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Great State of North Carolina
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
contact anywhere is incidental until it is obstruction, interference, or malicious contact.
I love this phrase simple and to the point. I've never heard it put this way before. I'm definately putting this one in my posket for future use. Thanks mbyron
__________________
Warren
www.umpire-empire.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Ump
I love this phrase simple and to the point. I've never heard it put this way before. I'm definately putting this one in my posket for future use. Thanks mbyron
You're welcome. Didn't Forrest's mama say, "Simple is as simple does"?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 02:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
You're welcome. Didn't Forrest's mama say, "Simple is as simple does"?

Yep
__________________
"That's all I have to say about that."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 03:47pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Ump
I love this phrase simple and to the point. I've never heard it put this way before. I'm definately putting this one in my posket for future use. Thanks mbyron
What about illegal contact? Don't forget that one.........

Illegal contact is not malicious contact.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 16, 2008, 06:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
In FED, if F2 has the ball, the runner must make a legal attempt (including a slide) to avoid the fielder. The runner's choices are "get down, go around, or give up".
Ahh, point taken. I was referring to a catch, drop oh $hit type of play that gets everyone screaming for blood!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Equipment Review: New Balance 450 Plate Shoes vs. Gerry Davis Plate Shoes MajorDave Baseball 2 Mon Apr 23, 2007 08:55am
contact at the plate - must slide? Ran.D Softball 20 Thu May 18, 2006 05:21pm
Contact At Home Plate gruberted Baseball 4 Thu Apr 21, 2005 09:27pm
Coed slopitch and the plate line vs home plate SactoBlue Softball 14 Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:42am
Contact with pitching plate mg43 Softball 6 Thu Jun 13, 2002 05:11pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1