![]() |
|
|
|||
No...but this is why I paid for the MLB TV subscription on MLB.com...so I could watch archived games when there is a cluster...(which is what I'm assuming happened).
When the game is over (and the Final 4 is over (its halftime of game 1) ) I'll be checking it out. |
|
|||
Bases loaded, 1 one out. Jose Reyes hits a diving line drive to Kotsay in CF. Kotsay traps the ball (it was pretty obvious to me on live TV) and Bruce Dreckman rules it a catch. Mets are fuming. Willie Randolph comes out to argue and the crew huddles. Note: The Braves got a double play because R2 did not tag up after he saw the ball hit the turf. Gerry Davis and his crew decided to credit each runner including the B-R with one base and allow one run to score. The kicker was that on the play the R2 passed R3 who stood on third thinking there had been a catch. Bobby Cox argued that the reversal of the call was OK but R2 should be called out because he passed R3. The umpires did not call R3 out.
All I can figure is that the crew realized that they had made a mistake and the only way to salvage it was to give each runner including the B-R one base. Lawrence |
|
|||
Quote:
Don't ever tell me agian that Replay doesn't have a place in baseball.
__________________
"Never try to teach a pig to eat reasonably. It wastes your time and the pig will argue that he is fat because of genetics. While drinking a 2.675 six packs a day." ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Now: The umpires got together, got the call right, put the runners where they believed they should be. With instant replay: UIC would view the instant replay, the umpires would get together, get the call right and put the runners where they believed they should be. Wow. What a difference IR would have made. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Both are exampled by your post above. By "interesting" I do mean as in watching a a cat with a hobbled leg fall in a lake.
__________________
"The size of the mind is proportionate to the ability to challenge the norm. " |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
A question on mechanics with reference to this play:
Did the U3 (Dreckman) ask for help and therefore, there was a conference that ultimately led to a reversal of the call? OR did the crew chief (I believe Davis) on his own call for a conference, and that ultimately led to the reversal (Dreckman changing his call)? The report I read in the paper indicated that Davis called for a conference among the umpires first. If it did occur this way, is this an acceptable procedure for umpire crew (whether 2-man, 3-man, 4-man, or 6-man) to at least start a discussion? |
|
|||
Quote:
It appears that MLB has adopted FED rule 10-2-3(l) Rectify any situation in which an umpire's decision that was reversed has placed either team at a disadvantage. Therefore, in the future there is precendent that in a game played under OBR rules we as umpires can "fix" it. Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
|
|||
Quote:
Once we see other examples, we might know. And, the general example (catch / no-catch with runners) is listed in NCAA as something that should not be changed. |
|
|||
Quote:
Are you saying that if the play in the Braves / Mets game was played under NCAA rules, then the DP would have stood? IMO, that goes against what the NCAA has been saying meaning 'get the call right" Bottom line: Give Gerry Davis credit. Even the infamous Bobby Cox didn't argue too much. His only "beef" was that he felt there should have been 2 outs (a runner passing another) Also, IMO, even though it's only one instance it does set some kind or precedent in PRO ball to allow umpires to "fix" things. I guess Rob Drake shut his site down just in time as IMO, his site would have over-loading with this play. Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|