![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Thinking strikes, thinking outs!! ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
"Sorry Congress, I got a prior engagement." |
|
|||
Quote:
If there is a charge on these baseball players, then let the Judicial System handle it and tell the Congress to go back to sleep until election time! All of this "investigating" costs money -- OUR MONEY! Who really gives a hoot if Clemens used steroids, anyway? Is it going to affect your life? Why doesn't baseball just enforce it's policy 9if there even is one) as of Jan 1 2008.... "If you are caught with steroids, your are out of baseball" and be done with it all! Regards
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out! Ozzy |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
From MLB.com (and dozens of other news outlets)
Report: Clemens sues McNamee. Pitcher claims defamation on part of former trainer
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out! Ozzy |
|
|||
Quote:
Congress can subpoena witnesses, or force them to testify under oath, before its committees. This authority comes from the Constitution's grant to Congress of “all legislative powers” (Article 1, Section 1). Witnesses are subpoenaed to provide information that will assist committees in preparing legislation. In the case of Mc-Grain v. Daugherty (1927), the Supreme Court recognized that Congress could subpoena even private citizens to testify. The Court noted that since not everyone would volunteer needed information, “some means of compulsion are essential to obtain what is needed.” Witnesses who refuse to respond to a congressional subpoena, or refuse to give information (unless they invoke their 5th Amendment protection against self-incrimination) may be found in contempt of Congress and sent to prison. Last edited by UMP25; Mon Jan 07, 2008 at 05:38pm. |
|
|||
Nothing in the Constitution declares the rulings of the SCOTUS as "the law of the land." SCOTUS has the power it currently dictates onto the people because it declared that power for itself (otherwise known as "The Divine rights of Justices"). SCOTUS continues its slow gathering of power to itself while neither of the other two branches have had the rocks to defy the Supreme Court's self-declared supremacy.
Since the executive is the only branch with police powers, and the legislative is the only branch with taxing / purse powers, either or both could legally and easily (theoretically) curtail the out-of-control (IMO) federal judiciary. They (executive and judiciary) have failed to adequately put the SCOTUS and the federal judiciary in general back in line as a co-equal branch, preferring to operate as subservient while trying to stack the court so the dictates of the court would agree with the politics of those currently in power in each branch. JMO, and only JMO.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Steve M, Tom B, Mike R, Mick, Roger G | whiskers_ump | Softball | 5 | Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:23pm |
This ain't the big leagues, Mr. Clemens | Adam | Basketball | 9 | Sat Aug 07, 2004 08:34pm |
Roger Clemens ejection. | Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. | Baseball | 10 | Fri Aug 06, 2004 09:33am |