![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.flixxy.com/boeing-jet-lan...st-maarten.htm flying right over your point, er, head. D00D, I was so ready for you. :D |
Quote:
I read your (SteveSanDiegoSups) post and it appeared he was saying "white collar" workers do not umpire as well as others.[/quote] Generaaly, I would say he is correct. WC guys don't have the field time, financial interests or the drive to be better. Or the ump orgs that will support them. Ring a cowbell? Moo? Income has little to nothing to do with ump efficiiency. Can a case be made that upper income WC guys are smarter. Given fact. Better umpires? Given and historically NO. Potentially better umpires with their "superior" educations, WC backgrounds, all that jazz? Probably. If brains were the best determinant, then we would need to recruit physicists. Brains are only a part. Probably not the most important part either. Good umpires coem from experience, a drive to be as good as they can be. A self-motivation that begins with the refusal to be anything less than they can be. Income has nothing, nothing to do with guts, determination, mental toughness and fight or, imo, most importantly, self-esteem and slef-judgment, self-appraisal. |
Quote:
Quote:
The point is that there are some very intelligent plumbers and electricians out there to go along with the doctors and lawyers. Sweeping generalizations such as the one's you made in your opening salvo demonstrate that such assumptions aren't always the case. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34pm. |