The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 14, 2002, 10:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
I don't believe this

SF writes:
" hope all understand your post, Garth, for what it truly is............"


I hope so, too: an attempt at tongue in cheek humor. I'll bet even Peter got it.

From now on, to avoid being misunderstood by you, I'll attach a warning:

"Caution, a dry, perhaps too subtle attempt at humor is enclosed in this post. To those of you humor-impaired, or just looking for a reason to start a fight: please do not read."

Good God.....

The original post posed the question of how we would work with good, competent umpires with whom we did not get along. I chose to illustrate my answer using Peter and myself as examples. Peter is a good, competent umpire and we have a past history of not getting along personally. I felt and still feel that this is an excellent example of being able to set aside personal differences and work together on the diamond.

So where is the insult? Answer: In your mind.

Where is the personal attack? Answer: There was none, just a truthful statement: I can work on the field with those with whom I don't get along off the field, even Peter, with whom I share a long history of not getting along. Where did I say anything that was untrue or mean-spirited?

As far as my association with eUmpire: I am not and never have been a moderator or employee. I was a contributing writer at one time, but a recent policy of eUmpire's dictates with whom I must develop a business relationship and, in my opinion, infringes on my right to association. I, therefore, ceased submitting articles to eUmpire.

I have learned one thing tonight: If it is at all possible for a post to be taken in the wrong way, you will do it.

If indeed Peter is offended by my post, I would apoligize, privately or publicly, whichever he prefers. I doubt seriously that is case. Peter would understand that I was addressing the premise of the original post.

If anyone who is unaware of our history or my sense of humor is offended, likewise, I would apologize.

But, I can offer no apology to you, Steve. The offense you have taken, you have created in your own mind.

A note to Senior, you are three fourths right. Jim, Peter and I would get along just fine. We understand the initial question and would set a fine example in answering it on the field.

[Edited by GarthB on Jan 15th, 2002 at 01:04 AM]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1