The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 20, 2007, 11:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceoflg
Since I have been given some great history lessons here, I thought I'd ask a question that has been slightly bugging me for years. I know the hands are not an extension of the bat, though I have heard that growing up and recently, sadly, by fellow broadcasters. How did that idea get started? Were the hands ever an extension of the bat in the ancient rulebooks?
Nope.

It might have started because, under certain situations, the proper call can be intepreted as that by fans, parents, network broadcasters and other morons.

Example: Batter is hit on the hands as he is swinging. The ball goes into foul territory.

In reality, the umpire calls time, deadball strike.

In appearance to the above mentioned individuals, foul ball.
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Not only are the hands part of the bat . . . greymule Softball 10 Thu Aug 17, 2006 06:35pm
Hands are part of the bat?? NSABlue Softball 12 Mon Jun 06, 2005 01:51pm
Hands part of the bat, page 5... JEL Softball 2 Tue May 24, 2005 10:05am
Hands not part of the bat Chess Ref Softball 7 Fri Apr 08, 2005 09:51am
Hands part of bat FLORIDA UMP Baseball 13 Sun Apr 21, 2002 08:46pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1