![]() |
|
|
|||
Toss up? Obstruction and Interference on same play
B1 hits short gapper to right. R1, slower than molasses, rounds second running into an apparently oblivious F6 (obs) and continues on to 3B where throw somehow just beats him to the base. R1 does a very fumbled slide into 3B as BR, a speed burner, motors towards second. The fumbled slide goes off to the side into F5 (int) interfering with F5's ability to get a throw off to 2B and the throw just misses BR.
Ruling? Interested in finding out how many have same opinion. |
|
|||
Quote:
Given that it is (and I'm not convinced based on the description), then R1 is awarded third on the obstruction, but is out on the interference. BR returns to first. |
|
|||
I'd also have to see it...interference would be a tough call here (again, I didn't see it)...but yep, that's what I'd call too...then get the offensive coach and talk to him before he blows up in your face. or not? :-)
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
This is strictly theoretical. Suffice it to say that the slide hindered the throw. This is one possibility. Absent the obs - R1 makes it to 3B standing up, instead of being out. Because he is awarded 3B on the obs, he can't be called for int, unless the two events are mutually exclusive. Given that, could you not also, call out BR if you felt that there was a legitimate play? I'm not necessarily ruling one way or the other, just trying to get a take on it. |
|
|||
The OBS and INT are seperate events. A runner 'protected' by OBS is not shielded against an INT call later in the play, just as the obstructed runner can be tagged out if he proceeds past his 'protected' base on his own volition.
|
|
|||
Don't we have a dead ball the instant the obstructed runner is apparently put out? If so, there's no INT, as nothing else happened.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
As for the OP, it is apparent that there are two differing codes regarding OBS: 1. Call DDB. Let play continue until all action is over. 2. Call DDB. Let play continue until all action is over OR the obstructed runner is put out before his/her protection is removed. In the former, the lead runner would be out on INT and the other returned to 1B. In the latter, the play would be killed as soon as the lead runner was 'out'. Runners would then be awarded bases. Since the ball was dead, there was no INT, so no outs. Personally, the latter makes more sense to me. |
|
|||
Quote:
Once he is "out" at third, call time, and "award" him third base on the obstruction. All other runners return to the last base they occupied when you called time. Now there is no interference because the ball has become dead. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again |
|
|||
Quote:
RULING: Umpire shall signal a delayed dead ball when the infraction by F5 occurs. At the conclusion of playing action, he declares the ball dead, then awards home to R1 and allows R2 to remain at third. The play is not the same, but the mechanics of calling DDB should be. Thoughts, anyone? |
|
|||
Big,
If this were an OBR game then Tex has given you the proper call. What started out as type B obstruction became type A as soon as R1 was played upon. This is a dead ball and R1 is awarded third. All other runners are awarded bases, if any, that will nullify the act of obstruction. Tim. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
obstruction/interference | ggk | Baseball | 4 | Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:13pm |
Obstruction, Interference, Double Play???? | JRSooner | Baseball | 3 | Thu Apr 06, 2006 02:02am |
Obstruction or interference | akalsey | Baseball | 6 | Mon Jun 21, 2004 08:00am |
Obstruction or Interference | sprivitor | Softball | 4 | Sat May 24, 2003 10:41am |
Weird Obstruction/Interference Play | gmtomko | Baseball | 11 | Thu Apr 24, 2003 05:36am |