The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Where to put the batter? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/33069-where-put-batter.html)

DTQ_Blue Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:05pm

Where to put the batter?
 
Bases empty 3-2 on batter. Pitch is in dirt, ball 4, bounces off catchers gear and into his team's dugout.

Does batter only get first, which he had anyway on the walk, or does he get second, i.e., a one base award beyond the base he was entitled to from the walk.

This happened in a tournament game tonight.

BTW, he was the potential tying run with his team down to its last out.

UmpJM Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:23pm

DTQ_Blue,

The Batter(-runner) gets 1B. There is no "cumulative property of addition" when it comes to base awards in a game of baseball.

JM

BigUmp56 Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTQ_Blue
Bases empty 3-2 on batter. Pitch is in dirt, ball 4, bounces off catchers gear and into his team's dugout.

Does batter only get first, which he had anyway on the walk, or does he get second, i.e., a one base award beyond the base he was entitled to from the walk.

This happened in a tournament game tonight.

BTW, he was the potential tying run with his team down to its last out.

Base awards are not accumulative. On a ball thrown into dead ball territory from the rubber the award is one base from the time the ball was released. Since the batter-runner had not legally obtained first base before the ball was released, that's as far as he goes on the award. The thing to remember is that on a base on balls a batter runner may be entitled to first base, but he has to advance to first legally in order to obtain the base.


Tim.

DTQ_Blue Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:19pm

Here's the OBR rule that's puzzling me on base awards...

(i) One base, if the batter becomes a runner on Ball Four or Strike Three, when the pitch passes the catcher and lodges in the umpire’s mask or paraphernalia.
If the batter becomes a runner on a wild pitch which entitles the runners to advance one base, the batter-runner shall be entitled to first base only.

Now what does the second clause achieve if it another rule already has limited the BR to first? As I read the rule it seems to be saying that the BR can't push another runner beyond the one base he is awarded, so the BR is "limited" to one base in this situation where there are runners on base.

For example if there is a runner on first, he is awarded second and that "limits" the BR to first.

However why have this rule if it were not legal to send the BR to second if there is not a runner on base when this happens?

What would be the purpose of this rule otherwise?

GarthB Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTQ_Blue
Here's the OBR rule that's puzzling me on base awards...

(i) One base, if the batter becomes a runner on Ball Four or Strike Three, when the pitch passes the catcher and lodges in the umpire’s mask or paraphernalia.
If the batter becomes a runner on a wild pitch which entitles the runners to advance one base, the batter-runner shall be entitled to first base only.

Now what does the second clause achieve if it another rule already has limited the BR to first? As I read the rule it seems to be saying that the BR can't push another runner beyond the one base he is awarded, so the BR is "limited" to one base in this situation where there are runners on base.

For example if there is a runner on first, he is awarded second and that "limits" the BR to first.

However why have this rule if it were not legal to send the BR to second if there is not a runner on base when this happens?

What would be the purpose of this rule otherwise?

You're reading too much into the rule. If you want to go in that direction, consider that there is only R3. B/R still gets first only.

The rule is saying to treat B/R as you would a runner.

JM has it right.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1