We can't spell

ozzy6900 · #1 (**permalink**) Fri Dec 15, 2006, 08:53pm

Here everyone, we all need this. It works with Internet Explorer and works very well. This way we will all be able to comuctate, uh commutate, um communicate without having to worry about our spelling!

ieSpell

Please download it - it's free!

briancurtin · #2 (**permalink**) Fri Dec 15, 2006, 09:14pm

i just noticed that the built-in spell check in Firefox 2.0 doesnt work on message boards like this. thats kind of odd.

SanDiegoSteve · #3 (**permalink**) Fri Dec 15, 2006, 11:54pm

Wow, that's pretty awesome. It does work just like MS Word. Now there should be no excuses!

Rich Ives · #4 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 16, 2006, 02:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

Wow, that's pretty awesome. It does work just like MS Word. Now there should be no excuses!

Ewe still have to use the write words or you're message may knot bee correct, even though its OK per the checker.

LDUB · #5 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 16, 2006, 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by briancurtin

i just noticed that the built-in spell check in Firefox 2.0 doesnt work on message boards like this. thats kind of odd.

I am using it on here right now.

greymule · #6 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 16, 2006, 07:48pm

reign in spending
forego further evaluation
would have lead to poorer outcomes
the lynchpin of the strategy

I saw these four this week during the course of my editing work. Four different Ivy League professors.

ASA/NYSSOBLUE · #7 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 16, 2006, 07:52pm

Foxfire 2.0 has spell check built right into the browser...this in addition to all the other FF treats...

greymule · #8 (**permalink**) Sat Dec 16, 2006, 09:22pm

Or, I saw these this week during the course of my editing work by four different Ivy League professors.

Hey, PWL, you're trying to hijack this thread into syntax!

briancurtin · #9 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 01:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB

I am using it on here right now.

does it work in the quick reply box for you? thats what i always use and its not working

then again, i use linux and some things in the linux version of firefox dont work as well (or at all) in comparison to the windows version

LDUB · #10 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 05:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by briancurtin

does it work in the quick reply box for you? thats what i always use and its not working

then again, i use linux and some things in the linux version of firefox dont work as well (or at all) in comparison to the windows version

Yes, it does. I figure you have already done it, but have you right clicked and pressed spell check this field?

bluezebra · #11 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 07:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule

Or, I saw these this week during the course of my editing work by four different Ivy League professors.

Hey, PWL, you're trying to hijack this thread into syntax!

Is there no end to what they'll tax?

Bob

NFump · #12 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 08:06pm

If they can the Dems will.

LMan · #13 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 10:18pm

Eil jest stick two Huked On Foniks, fanks!

briancurtin · #14 (**permalink**) Sun Dec 17, 2006, 10:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB

Yes, it does. I figure you have already done it, but have you right clicked and pressed spell check this field?

well thats one thing i didnt know...i got it working now thanks to that right click. everything else just spell checked automatically for me
thanks for that

pob14 · #15 (**permalink**) Tue Dec 19, 2006, 04:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule

***
forego further evaluation
***
the lynchpin of the strategy

Merriam-Webster Online lists both of those as acceptable variants.

Of course, Merriam is notoriously permissive, but there you go.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Here's some ADVICE on how to spell advice...(nm) :)	Stripes130	Basketball	1	Thu Jul 19, 2001 11:21pm