The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   We can't spell (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/30235-we-cant-spell.html)

ozzy6900 Fri Dec 15, 2006 08:53pm

We can't spell
 
Here everyone, we all need this. It works with Internet Explorer and works very well. This way we will all be able to comuctate, uh commutate, um communicate without having to worry about our spelling!

ieSpell

Please download it - it's free! :cool:

briancurtin Fri Dec 15, 2006 09:14pm

i just noticed that the built-in spell check in Firefox 2.0 doesnt work on message boards like this. thats kind of odd.

SanDiegoSteve Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:54pm

Wow, that's pretty awesome. It does work just like MS Word. Now there should be no excuses!

Rich Ives Sat Dec 16, 2006 02:26pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Wow, that's pretty awesome. It does work just like MS Word. Now there should be no excuses!

Ewe still have to use the write words or you're message may knot bee correct, even though its OK per the checker.

LDUB Sat Dec 16, 2006 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by briancurtin
i just noticed that the built-in spell check in Firefox 2.0 doesnt work on message boards like this. thats kind of odd.

I am using it on here right now.

greymule Sat Dec 16, 2006 07:48pm

reign in spending
forego further evaluation
would have lead to poorer outcomes
the lynchpin of the strategy

I saw these four this week during the course of my editing work. Four different Ivy League professors.

ASA/NYSSOBLUE Sat Dec 16, 2006 07:52pm

Foxfire 2.0 has spell check built right into the browser...this in addition to all the other FF treats...

greymule Sat Dec 16, 2006 09:22pm

Or, I saw these this week during the course of my editing work by four different Ivy League professors.

Hey, PWL, you're trying to hijack this thread into syntax!

briancurtin Sun Dec 17, 2006 01:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB
I am using it on here right now.

does it work in the quick reply box for you? thats what i always use and its not working

then again, i use linux and some things in the linux version of firefox dont work as well (or at all) in comparison to the windows version

LDUB Sun Dec 17, 2006 05:04pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by briancurtin
does it work in the quick reply box for you? thats what i always use and its not working

then again, i use linux and some things in the linux version of firefox dont work as well (or at all) in comparison to the windows version

Yes, it does. I figure you have already done it, but have you right clicked and pressed spell check this field?

bluezebra Sun Dec 17, 2006 07:09pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule
Or, I saw these this week during the course of my editing work by four different Ivy League professors.

Hey, PWL, you're trying to hijack this thread into <b>syntax</b>!

Is there no end to what they'll tax?

Bob

NFump Sun Dec 17, 2006 08:06pm

If they can the Dems will.

LMan Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:18pm

Eil jest stick two Huked On Foniks, fanks!

briancurtin Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LDUB
Yes, it does. I figure you have already done it, but have you right clicked and pressed spell check this field?

well thats one thing i didnt know...i got it working now thanks to that right click. everything else just spell checked automatically for me
thanks for that

pob14 Tue Dec 19, 2006 04:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule
***
forego further evaluation
***
the lynchpin of the strategy

Merriam-Webster Online lists both of those as acceptable variants.

Of course, Merriam is notoriously permissive, but there you go.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1