The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   One from the mound? (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/28661-one-mound.html)

greymule Tue Oct 03, 2006 09:30pm

One from the mound?
 
Yankees-Tigers bottom 6th. Abreu on 1B, pitcher steps off the pitchers's plate and throws to 1B, and the ball goes off F3's glove and into the stands.

Abreu given 2B only.

Huh??

SanDiegoSteve Tue Oct 03, 2006 09:38pm

He was on the rubber. I payed close attention on the replay. They got it right.

greymule Tue Oct 03, 2006 09:58pm

He was on the rubber.

Sure didn't look like it to me. But maybe it's a matter of interpretation. He was on the rubber when he started to throw—in other words, he did not step back and throw—but I think his foot was off when he released the ball. I guess that qualifies as throwing from the ruibber.

mbyron Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:30pm

He made a standard jump step, which is legal and counts as throwing from the rubber.

greymule Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:43pm

Good thing I turned down the offer to ump that game.

mbyron Wed Oct 04, 2006 06:28am

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule
Good thing I turned down the offer to ump that game.

Oh, I dunno, you might have done better than Angel, our forum's favorite whipping boy.

ctblu40 Wed Oct 04, 2006 07:17am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron
He made a standard jump step, which is legal and counts as throwing from the rubber.

The way I always think of this is that the pitcher is legally "in contact" unless he steps off as per "8.01 (e) If the pitcher removes his pivot foot from contact with the pitcher’s plate by stepping backward with that foot, he thereby becomes an infielder..."

In other words, this is the way the rules describe how a pitcher disengages. Any other move and he's still in contact.

mbyron Wed Oct 04, 2006 09:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctblu40
The way I always think of this is that the pitcher is legally "in contact" unless he steps off as per "8.01 (e) If the pitcher removes his pivot foot from contact with the pitcher’s plate by stepping backward with that foot, he thereby becomes an infielder..."

In other words, this is the way the rules describe how a pitcher disengages. Any other move and he's still in contact.

But then what's your call if he steps off with the free foot and throws it out of play? (OBR, naturally.) Was he in contact of not?

sargee7 Wed Oct 04, 2006 09:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbyron
But then what's your call if he steps off with the free foot and throws it out of play? (OBR, naturally.) Was he in contact of not?

If he hasn't stepped off with the pivot foot then he hasn't stepped off.

GarthB Wed Oct 04, 2006 09:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ctblu40
The way I always think of this is that the pitcher is legally "in contact" unless he steps off as per "8.01 (e) If the pitcher removes his pivot foot from contact with the pitcher’s plate by stepping backward with that foot, he thereby becomes an infielder..."

In other words, this is the way the rules describe how a pitcher disengages. Any other move and he's still in contact.

Exactly. I find it easier to explain to coaches by using the term "disengage" instead of "stepping off". One can step off a number of ways, but there is only one way to "disengage".

greymule Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:17am

So the fake to 3B and quick turn and throw to 1B is considered "on" (even if the foot is off) because the pitcher did not technically "disengage" by stepping off backward. (Or am I wrong?)

I'm surprised that in my 30+ years of umpiring, this never came up. I guess nobody did this move and then threw the ball into DBT.

I haven't done Fed in a long time. Is their rule different?

Tim C Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:26am

Hmm,
 
Greymule:

I sometimes scratch my head as you seem to be:

Legally disengaging seems, to me, to be a moving target.

Through usage and tradition we have found that under OBR a pitcher that "fakes to third and then throws to first" is to have legally disengaged during the move although he does not step backwards off the pitcher's plate as noted in the rule.

We also know that, while possible, it is highly unlikely that a pitcher will actually fake to third and then turn and throw to first without disengaging sometime during the action.

A jump turn and jab step are considered clearly to be deemed "from the rubber" while, what appears to be an illegal disengagement, is condered not in contact.

With that,

Scratching my head,

Regards,

GarthB Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:29am

Quote:

Originally Posted by greymule
So the fake to 3B and quick turn and throw to 1B is considered "on" (even if the foot is off) because the pitcher did not technically "disengage" by stepping off backward. (Or am I wrong?)

I'm surprised that in my 30+ years of umpiring, this never came up. I guess nobody did this move and then threw the ball into DBT.

I haven't done Fed in a long time. Is their rule different?

No, we didn't explain this appropriately. I apologize.

My reference to disengage vs stepping off was to discussions with coaches about moves directly to first.

In OBR the 3-1 move you are referring to must include separation from the rubber. This is why the pitcher may, and most often does, fake the throw to first.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1