Oh, that's a different question. But the answer is the same.

Quoting from page 3:

"The basic rules for all Baseball Leagues can be found in the National Federation of State High School Associations Rules."

Garth,

Hmmm... I'll have to think about that a little.

Now, I would agree that the quote you posted from page 3 seems pretty straightforward - at least until you get to page 5 and find the following:

Is your answer still the same, or different?

JM

Well, since it seems that it's okay to violate the rules of this thread, and not just give a simple answer with no rationale provided, I will weigh in.

My answer of OBR is due to many Little League rules incorporated in as well as the bracketing being exactly the same as PONY baseball (which I thought was patented to start with).

Both of these organizations' rules are based on OBR, so even though it is stated on page 3 that the rules are based on NFHS rules, I believe the opposite is really the case. I was hard pressed to find anything remotely similar to high school rules within the playing rules.

Like Garth, I saw NFHS on page 3. Now you're showing entirely different base rules. Somebody needs to do some editing.

I saw both the OBR, NFHS, and ASA references - and thusly threw them all out. I based my GUESS (and for any of us this is truly a guess) on the age bracket names which are mimicked after PONY, and I believe PONY uses OBR.

As your question now asks which code does the house set say to use, I'd have to answer: both, however, the reference to OBR on page five is stronger than the reference to FED on page 3.

As for the local rules, attempting to link them to one code or another is fruitless. Just because they may have a similarity to
PONY's or any other league's add-ons doesn't mean a thing. Add-ons are not automatically tied to one code or another.

The whole situation is close to a FUBAR. A total re-write is called for. I assume you have volunteered for the job.

I would submit, and believe I could support a case that, ALL local rules are FUBAR. I've yet to see one that was both A) necessary and B) consistent and complete.

The lone exception is time-limits, which I hate, but can see the need for in certain cases.

Thanks Coach......Fed

What I think!
 

FED Rules

Thanks
David

According to the quotes we've seen, anything related to baseball and listed after page 5 is covered by the NBC. Prior to that, the rules are Fed related.
(Sorry, but that was too easy.)

Anyone else wonder why house leagues typically recruit the lowest common denominator umpire in many parts? (Hey, he has a patch and a heartbeat! Are you available?)

Good luck with that league coach - I'd love to see the technical committee at work.

While the dual references don't make much sense, having to choose one over the other, I read the OBR reference as governing.

My thanks to all who have replied. After Garth's "that's a different question..." reply, I realized that I had not worded my initial question very well.

What I meant to ask was, based on what the linked rules say should the OBR rules or the FED rules be used to adjudicate all the things which are not covered in the linked "House Rules".

As you now know, it says two different things in two different places. (Similarly, for the house softball leagues, in one place it specifies ASA & in another NFHS.) I am of the opinion that the specification of OBR "trumps" the specification of NFHS because immediately following the specification of NFHS as what I referred to as the "foundation rules", the rules also include the statement:

The "DYBA General Rules" is the section that specifies OBR as the "foundation rules". So, I believe that a "literalist" reading of the rules say that OBR takes precedence over FED in the adjudication of the league's games. I also am quite confident that the league's INTENT is that the FED rules be used as the basic playing rules.

While I too have a deep-seated aversion to "local rules", I have come to the conclusion that they are an inevitable annoyance. If they are going to exist, I believe they should be as few as possible and as "good" as possible.

While I have no intention of volunteering to rewrite these rules, I am planning to send a few observations regarding them to the individual who is in charge of these rules.

From a pragmatic point of view, I can only remember two occasions in four years of coaching in this league where a FED/OBR rule difference would have had an impact on the proper ruling in a game situation, so it's not that big a deal.

I was curious to see how the umpires on the forum would read the rules in responding to my question.

I genuinely appreciate those of you who took the time to respond. Thanks.

John

I love the part that describes what kind of blue jeans the umpire can wear. Yeah, that's a real good look.:rolleyes:

For a league that messed up, my interp fit best. ;)

:eek:

FED