INT--a sticky wicket

[Dave Hensley]

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve

No, but I am suggesting that Ace got the call right, no interference.

And I never suggested that he didn't get the call right. I said given the facts, I would have been more likely to instinctively judge interference when the runner ran into the fielder almost simultaneously with him fielding the ball (I think Ace called it a New York second). Interference is a judgment call - unprotestable on the field and for the most part un-debatable as to whether a particular call was "right or wrong."